These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16506724)

  • 1. Protecting health information privacy in research: what's an ethics committee like yours doing in a job like this?
    Thomson C
    J Law Med; 2006 Feb; 13(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 16506724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Privacy and research involving humans.
    Gaze B
    J Law Med; 2003 May; 10(4):410-34. PubMed ID: 12852316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.
    Willison DJ; Emerson C; Szala-Meneok KV; Gibson E; Schwartz L; Weisbaum KM; Fournier F; Brazil K; Coughlin MD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 18375687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A welcome guide for evaluating medical research involving human subjects].
    Borst-Eilers E
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 May; 147(19):898-900. PubMed ID: 12768802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A qualitative study of Institutional Ethics Committees: Members' understanding of research guidelines, privacy, and challenges to privacy protection.
    Mishra NN; Bhatia T; Nimgaonkar VL; Deshpande SN; Parker LS
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2018; 3(4):315-320. PubMed ID: 30121562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Research ethics and revised law regarding the Danish Central Scientific Ethical Committee].
    Kamper-Jørgensen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Jun; 166(24):2337-40. PubMed ID: 15281571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidentiality and autonomy: the challenge(s) of offering research participants a choice of disclosing their identity.
    Giordano J; O'Reilly M; Taylor H; Dogra N
    Qual Health Res; 2007 Feb; 17(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 17220396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Balancing privacy protections with efficient research: institutional review boards and the use of certificates of confidentiality.
    Currie PM
    IRB; 2005; 27(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 16425475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Online survey tools: ethical and methodological concerns of human research ethics committees.
    Buchanan EA; Hvizdak EE
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2009 Jun; 4(2):37-48. PubMed ID: 19480590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of the privacy principles to general practice.
    Mulligan E; Rogers W; Braunack-Mayer A
    Aust Fam Physician; 2001 Feb; 30(2):189-91. PubMed ID: 11280123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Ethics review committees for human research: the challenge of strengthening this process in Colombia].
    Miranda MC; Palma GI; Jaramillo E
    Biomedica; 2006 Mar; 26(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 16929911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Untapped potential: IRB guidance for the ethical research use of stored biological materials.
    Wolf LE; Lo B
    IRB; 2004; 26(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 15449408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidentiality: more than a linkage file and a locked drawer.
    Easter MM; Davis AM; Henderson GE
    IRB; 2004; 26(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 15069972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health researchers' views of ethics committee functioning in New Zealand.
    Paul C
    N Z Med J; 2000 Jun; 113(1111):210-4. PubMed ID: 10909934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protecting human research from an invasion of privacy: the unintended results of the Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988.
    Bentley-Cooper JE
    Aust J Public Health; 1991 Sep; 15(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1932329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A practical guideline for identifying research intent with projects that collect private, identifiable health information.
    Amdur RJ; Speers MA
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 26(3):e7-12. PubMed ID: 12796610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The administrative court of appeal made the Gillberg issue go wrong. Unclear allocation of responsibility between the ethics committee and the court].
    Gottfries CG
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Aug 22-28; 102(34):2326-7. PubMed ID: 16167632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data registers in respiratory medicine: a pilot project evaluating compliance with privacy laws and the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans.
    Clarke C; Magnusson RS
    J Law Med; 2002 Aug; 10(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 12242886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethical and legal considerations in video recording neonatal resuscitations.
    Gelbart B; Barfield C; Watkins A
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 19181886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New guidance on when and how to report human research problems.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 16270442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.