334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16506991)
1. Accounting for both random errors and systematic errors in uncertainty propagation analysis of computer models involving experimental measurements with Monte Carlo methods.
Vasquez VR; Whiting WB
Risk Anal; 2005 Dec; 25(6):1669-81. PubMed ID: 16506991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying and reporting uncertainty from systematic errors.
Phillips CV
Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 12843772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to account for uncertainty due to measurement errors in an uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation.
Hofer E
Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 18695409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uncertainty analysis based on probability bounds (p-box) approach in probabilistic safety assessment.
Karanki DR; Kushwaha HS; Verma AK; Ajit S
Risk Anal; 2009 May; 29(5):662-75. PubMed ID: 19302279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Errors associated with metabolic control analysis. Application Of Monte-Carlo simulation of experimental data.
Ainscow EK; Brand MD
J Theor Biol; 1998 Sep; 194(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 9778435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative analysis of variability and uncertainty with known measurement error: methodology and case study.
Zheng J; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2005 Jun; 25(3):663-75. PubMed ID: 16022698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uncertainties in personal dosimetry for external radiation: a Monte Carlo approach.
van Dijk JW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 17052989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
Chatburn RL
AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of ISO-GUM and Monte Carlo methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty: application to direct cadmium measurement in water by GFAAS.
Theodorou D; Meligotsidou L; Karavoltsos S; Burnetas A; Dassenakis M; Scoullos M
Talanta; 2011 Feb; 83(5):1568-74. PubMed ID: 21238753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of a Monte Carlo method for uncertainty calculation, with an application to the measurement of neutron ambient dose equivalent rate.
Cox M; Harris P; Nam G; Thomas D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 16877469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of recall errors and of selection bias in epidemiologic studies of mobile phone use and cancer risk.
Vrijheid M; Deltour I; Krewski D; Sanchez M; Cardis E
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 16(4):371-84. PubMed ID: 16773122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Joint propagation of variability and imprecision in assessing the risk of groundwater contamination.
Baudrit C; Guyonnet D; Dubois D
J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):72-84. PubMed ID: 17321003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian modeling of measurement errors and pesticide concentration in dietary risk assessments.
Kennedy M; Hart A
Risk Anal; 2009 Oct; 29(10):1427-42. PubMed ID: 19645757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.
Hossain S; Gustafson P
Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(11):1580-600. PubMed ID: 19226564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using surrogate modeling in the prediction of fibrinogen adsorption onto polymer surfaces.
Smith JR; Knight D; Kohn J; Rasheed K; Weber N; Kholodovych V; Welsh WJ
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):1088-97. PubMed ID: 15154777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Copula based prediction models: an application to an aortic regurgitation study.
Kumar P; Shoukri MM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():21. PubMed ID: 17573974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
Flores-Alsina X; RodrÃguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Least squares in calibration: dealing with uncertainty in x.
Tellinghuisen J
Analyst; 2010 Aug; 135(8):1961-9. PubMed ID: 20577693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uncertainty in allometric exponent estimation: a case study in scaling metabolic rate with body mass.
Hui D; Jackson RB
J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(1):168-77. PubMed ID: 17720203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of the effects of measurement errors on the evaluation of propagation coefficients, in rubber tubes and canine aorta in vivo.
Bertram CD; She J
Technol Health Care; 1995 Dec; 3(3):161-84. PubMed ID: 8749864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
