913 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16507066)
21. Expectancy of an open-book test decreases performance on a delayed closed-book test.
Agarwal PK; Roediger HL
Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):836-52. PubMed ID: 21995673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Is there a memory profit after repeated learning of subject-performed actions? Comparing direct and long-term memory performance level as a function of age.
Schatz TR; Spranger T; Knopf M
Scand J Psychol; 2010 Dec; 51(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 20546198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.
Chan JC; McDermott KB
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 17352622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
Rowland CA
Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 140(6):1432-63. PubMed ID: 25150680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Repeated testing, item selection, and relearning: the benefits of testing outweigh the costs.
de Jonge M; Tabbers HK
Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 23422656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effects of free recall testing on subsequent source memory.
Brewer GA; Marsh RL; Meeks JT; Clark-Foos A; Hicks JL
Memory; 2010 May; 18(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 20408041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. On the placement of practice questions during study.
Weinstein Y; Nunes LD; Karpicke JD
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2016 Mar; 22(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 26950160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Critical Importance of Retrieval--and Spacing--for Learning.
Soderstrom NC; Kerr TK; Bjork RA
Psychol Sci; 2016 Feb; 27(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 26674128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Memory processes and aging: a defect of automatic rather than controlled processes?
Delbecq-Derouesné J; Beauvois MF
Arch Gerontol Geriatr Suppl; 1989; 1():121-50. PubMed ID: 2757728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Why testing improves memory: mediator effectiveness hypothesis.
Pyc MA; Rawson KA
Science; 2010 Oct; 330(6002):335. PubMed ID: 20947756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of testing on subsequent re-encoding and long-term forgetting of action-relevant materials: On the influence of recall type.
Kubik V; Nilsson LG; Olofsson JK; Jönsson FU
Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 26243692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mental relaxation improves long-term incidental visual memory.
Nava E; Landau D; Brody S; Linder L; Schächinger H
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2004 May; 81(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 15082018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The contributions of encoding, retention, and recall to the Hebb effect.
Oberauer K; Meyer N
Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):774-81. PubMed ID: 19598058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Study for now, but judge for later: delayed judgments of learning promote long-term retention.
Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Kubik V; Jönsson FU
Scand J Psychol; 2012 Dec; 53(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 22897518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The importance of seeing the patient: test-enhanced learning with standardized patients and written tests improves clinical application of knowledge.
Larsen DP; Butler AC; Lawson AL; Roediger HL
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Aug; 18(3):409-25. PubMed ID: 22618856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Is testing a more effective learning strategy than note-taking?
Rummer R; Schweppe J; Gerst K; Wagner S
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Sep; 23(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 28933873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Material-specific memory in traumatic brain injury: differential effects during acquisition, recall, and retention.
Vanderploeg RD; Curtiss G; Schinka JA; Lanham RA
Neuropsychology; 2001 Apr; 15(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 11324861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Memorial consequences of answering SAT II questions.
Marsh EJ; Agarwal PK; Roediger HL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19309212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect.
Smith TA; Kimball DR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20053046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
