These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16507074)

  • 1. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 16507074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Lohmann D
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 12190908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 16507073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Börjes L; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2014 May; 47(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 23998461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 23240965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 17107539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
    Bürklein S; Mathey D; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Aug; 48(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 25156248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
    Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.
    Liu SB; Fan B; Cheung GS; Peng B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Song YL; Fu Q; Bian Z
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 17212077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Apical transportation and canal straightening with different continuously tapered rotary file systems in severely curved root canals: F6 SkyTaper and OneShape versus Mtwo.
    Bürklein S; Jäger PG; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2017 Oct; 50(10):983-990. PubMed ID: 27809348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cleaning and shaping curved root canals: Mtwo vs ProTaper instruments, a lab comparison.
    Kuzekanani M; Walsh LJ; Yousefi MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):268-70. PubMed ID: 19884706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of Mtwo versus coated and uncoated EasyShape instruments in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Bürklein S; Hiller C; Huda M; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):447-57. PubMed ID: 21276014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative study on the shaping ability of canals with 2 new nickel- titanium rotary instruments].
    Li Z; Yu JT; Shou FY; Li L; Wu HB
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Feb; 19(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 20300704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Mtwo and RaCe Rotary Instruments in the Preparation of Curved Canals.
    Canga M; Malagnino I; Malagnino G; Malagnino V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Feb; 21(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 32381814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.