366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16507528)
1. Fundamental differences between the methods of maximum likelihood and maximum posterior probability in phylogenetics.
Svennblad B; Erixon P; Oxelman B; Britton T
Syst Biol; 2006 Feb; 55(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 16507528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polytomies and Bayesian phylogenetic inference.
Lewis PO; Holder MT; Holsinger KE
Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):241-53. PubMed ID: 16012095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny.
Yang Z; Rannala B
Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):455-70. PubMed ID: 16012111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of branch length uncertainty on Bayesian posterior probabilities for phylogenetic hypotheses.
Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Sep; 24(9):2108-18. PubMed ID: 17636043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
Ekman S; Blaalid R
Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating trees from filtered data: identifiability of models for morphological phylogenetics.
Allman ES; Holder MT; Rhodes JA
J Theor Biol; 2010 Mar; 263(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 20004210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the distributions of bootstrap support and posterior distributions for a star tree.
Susko E
Syst Biol; 2008 Aug; 57(4):602-12. PubMed ID: 18709598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models.
Huelsenbeck J; Rannala B
Syst Biol; 2004 Dec; 53(6):904-13. PubMed ID: 15764559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fair-balance paradox, star-tree paradox, and Bayesian phylogenetics.
Yang Z
Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Aug; 24(8):1639-55. PubMed ID: 17488737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An examination of the monophyly of morning glory taxa using Bayesian phylogenetic inference.
Miller RE; Buckley TR; Manos PS
Syst Biol; 2002 Oct; 51(5):740-53. PubMed ID: 12396588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis?
Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
Syst Biol; 2008 Feb; 57(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18275003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous.
Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):980-4. PubMed ID: 15496922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strange bayes indeed: uniform topological priors imply non-uniform clade priors.
Pickett KM; Randle CP
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2005 Jan; 34(1):203-11. PubMed ID: 15579393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pitfalls of heterogeneous processes for phylogenetic reconstruction.
Stefankovic D; Vigoda E
Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 17366141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of protein sequence data under relative branch-length differences and model violation.
Mar JC; Harlow TJ; Ragan MA
BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 15676079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology.
Huelsenbeck JP; Ronquist F; Nielsen R; Bollback JP
Science; 2001 Dec; 294(5550):2310-4. PubMed ID: 11743192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visualizing conflicting evolutionary hypotheses in large collections of trees: using consensus networks to study the origins of placentals and hexapods.
Holland B; Delsuc F; Moulton V
Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 15805011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When trees grow too long: investigating the causes of highly inaccurate bayesian branch-length estimates.
Brown JM; Hedtke SM; Lemmon AR; Lemmon EM
Syst Biol; 2010 Mar; 59(2):145-61. PubMed ID: 20525627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SuperTRI: A new approach based on branch support analyses of multiple independent data sets for assessing reliability of phylogenetic inferences.
Ropiquet A; Li B; Hassanin A
C R Biol; 2009 Sep; 332(9):832-47. PubMed ID: 19748458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How meaningful are Bayesian support values?
Simmons MP; Pickett KM; Miya M
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jan; 21(1):188-99. PubMed ID: 14595090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
