These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1650964)
1. [The service life of Cerec abrasive disks]. Fehér A; Mörmann WH; Lutz F Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1991; 101(7):857-63. PubMed ID: 1650964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Efficiency and margin quality in the computer-assisted molding and grinding of ceramic inlays]. Furrer O; Mörmann WH Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1993; 103(7):851-9. PubMed ID: 8356420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements. Krejci I; Lutz F; Reimer M Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 8008821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surface roughness of two polished ceramic materials. Scurria MS; Powers JM J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Feb; 71(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 8126673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The preparation of ceramic restorations with superfine diamond instruments]. Fehér A; Mörmann WH Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1995; 105(4):474-9. PubMed ID: 7754336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Grinding precision and accuracy of the fit of Cerec-2 CAD/CIM inlays]. Schug J; Pfeiffer J; Sener B; Mörmann WH Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1995; 105(7):913-9. PubMed ID: 7631183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finishing of MGC Dicor material. Shearer AC; Kusy RP; Whitley JQ; Heymann HO; Wilson NH Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 8003198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of a low-fusing and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic material. Dalkiz M; Sipahi C; Beydemir B J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 19141045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morphological effects of surface treatments on ceramic restorative materials. Estafan D; Martin KU; Dussetschleger F; Estafan A Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 11763900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiopacity of direct ceramic inlay restoratives. el-Mowafy OM; Brown JW; McComb D J Dent; 1991 Dec; 19(6):366-8. PubMed ID: 1813481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new approach to restorative dentistry: fabricating ceramic restorations using CEREC CAD/CAM. Estafan D; David A; David S; Calamia J Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Jun; 20(6):555-60; quiz 562. PubMed ID: 10650368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC 2 CAD-CIM inlays. Mörmann WH; Schug J J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Jan; 128(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 9002401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance. Siervo S; Pampalone A; Siervo P; Siervo R Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):773-9. PubMed ID: 7568682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics. Ahmad R; Morgano SM; Wu BM; Giordano RA J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 16275301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The strength of ceramic and polymer after CAD/CIM treatment and in a bond with dentin]. Kümin P; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1993; 103(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 8235524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 3-year study of inlays milled from machinable ceramic blocks representing 2 different inlay systems. Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P Quintessence Int; 1999 Dec; 30(12):829-36. PubMed ID: 10765860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces. Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of CAD-CAM diamond bur deterioration on surface roughness and maximum failure load of Y-TZP-based restorations. Corazza PH; de Castro HL; Feitosa SA; Kimpara ET; Della Bona A Am J Dent; 2015 Apr; 28(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 26087575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques. Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]