208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16509833)
1. Status of mammography after the Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial: digital versus film.
Dershaw DD
Breast J; 2006; 12(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 16509833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.
Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Yaffe MJ; Baum JK; Acharyya S; Cormack JB; Hanna LA; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Jong RA; Rebner M; Tosteson AN; Gatsonis CA;
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):376-83. PubMed ID: 18227537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology.
Pisano ED; Gatsonis CA; Yaffe MJ; Hendrick RE; Tosteson AN; Fryback DG; Bassett LW; Baum JK; Conant EF; Jong RA; Rebner M; D'Orsi CJ
Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):404-12. PubMed ID: 15961755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cancer cases from ACRIN digital mammographic imaging screening trial: radiologist analysis with use of a logistic regression model.
Pisano ED; Acharyya S; Cole EB; Marques HS; Yaffe MJ; Blevins M; Conant EF; Hendrick RE; Baum JK; Fajardo LL; Jong RA; Koomen MA; Kuzmiak CM; Lee Y; Pavic D; Yoon SC; Padungchaichote W; Gatsonis C
Radiology; 2009 Aug; 252(2):348-57. PubMed ID: 19703878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts.
Del Turco MR; Mantellini P; Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Martinelli F; Lazzari B; Houssami N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):860-6. PubMed ID: 17885057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.
Pisano ED; Gatsonis C; Hendrick E; Yaffe M; Baum JK; Acharyya S; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett L; D'Orsi C; Jong R; Rebner M;
N Engl J Med; 2005 Oct; 353(17):1773-83. PubMed ID: 16169887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technology evaluation center assessment synopsis: full-field digital mammography.
Rothenberg BM; Ziegler KM; Aronson N
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):586-8. PubMed ID: 17412133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program.
Séradour B; Heid P; Estève J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 24370149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program.
Heddson B; Rönnow K; Olsson M; Miller D
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 17383841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening.
Tosteson AN; Stout NK; Fryback DG; Acharyya S; Herman BA; Hannah LG; Pisano ED;
Ann Intern Med; 2008 Jan; 148(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18166758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I.
Bloomquist AK; Yaffe MJ; Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Mawdsley GE; Bright S; Shen SZ; Mahesh M; Nickoloff EL; Fleischman RC; Williams MB; Maidment AD; Beideck DJ; Och J; Seibert JA
Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):719-36. PubMed ID: 16878575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study.
Hendrick RE; Cole EB; Pisano ED; Acharyya S; Marques H; Cohen MA; Jong RA; Mawdsley GE; Kanal KM; D'Orsi CJ; Rebner M; Gatsonis C
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 18372463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current state of digital mammography.
Shiraishi A
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 18365303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital mammographic screening in Japan.
Ishibashi T; Kawasumi Y; Yamada T; Sai M; Uematsu T; Uchiyama N
Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 20072821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.
Kerlikowske K; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Lehman CD; Taplin SH; Sickles EA;
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(8):493-502. PubMed ID: 22007043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic population.
Seo BK; Pisano ED; Kuzmiak CM; Koomen M; Pavic D; McLelland R; Lee Y; Cole EB; Mattingly D; Lee J
Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1229-35. PubMed ID: 16979072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial.
Yaffe MJ; Bloomquist AK; Mawdsley GE; Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Fajardo LL; Boone JM; Kanal K; Mahesh M; Fleischman RC; Och J; Williams MB; Beideck DJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):737-52. PubMed ID: 16878576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
Van Ongeval Ch
JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How to transition to digital mammography.
Zuley M
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):178-83. PubMed ID: 17412259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital mammography: an update.
Schulz-Wendtland R; Fuchsjäger M; Wacker T; Hermann KP
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 19592186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
