380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16509840)
1. Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma.
Scopa CD; Aroukatos P; Tsamandas AC; Aletra C
Breast J; 2006; 12(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 16509840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Defining the clinical target volume for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation: a pathologic analysis.
Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):722-30. PubMed ID: 15465188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defining negative margins in DCIS patients treated with breast conservation therapy: The University of Chicago experience.
Sahoo S; Recant WM; Jaskowiak N; Tong L; Heimann R
Breast J; 2005; 11(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 15982389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship between shaved margin and inked margin status in breast excision specimens.
Guidi AJ; Connolly JL; Harris JR; Schnitt SJ
Cancer; 1997 Apr; 79(8):1568-73. PubMed ID: 9118040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
Smitt MC; Horst K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients.
Bakhshandeh M; Tutuncuoglu SO; Fischer G; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):656-9. PubMed ID: 17854083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique.
Chagpar AB; Martin RC; Hagendoorn LJ; Chao C; McMasters KM
Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 15474434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between initial margin status for invasive breast cancer and residual carcinoma after re-excision.
Kotwall C; Ranson M; Stiles A; Hamann MS
Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 17439024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient age and positive margins are predictive factors of residual tumor on mastectomy specimen after conservative treatment for breast cancer.
Voguet L; Hébert T; Levêque J; Acker O; Mesbah H; Marret H; Porée P; Body G
Breast; 2009 Aug; 18(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 19628389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins.
Cox CE; Pendas S; Ku NN; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HS; Nicosia SV
Am Surg; 1998 Jun; 64(6):533-7; discussion 537-8. PubMed ID: 9619174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of lobular carcinoma in situ in association with invasive breast cancer on the rate of local recurrence in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Jolly S; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Vicini FA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Oct; 66(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 16965988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of resection margins in patients treated with breast conservation surgery.
Zavagno G; Goldin E; Mencarelli R; Capitanio G; Del Bianco P; Marconato R; Mocellin S; Marconato G; Belardinelli V; Marcon F; Nitti D
Cancer; 2008 May; 112(9):1923-31. PubMed ID: 18327818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy.
Dillon MF; Hill AD; Quinn CM; McDermott EW; O'Higgins N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 16474911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins.
Cellini C; Hollenbeck ST; Christos P; Martins D; Carson J; Kemper S; Lavigne E; Chan E; Simmons R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 15383425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Importance of margin status in outcome of breast-conserving surgery for carcinoma.
Pittinger TP; Maronian NC; Poulter CA; Peacock JL
Surgery; 1994 Oct; 116(4):605-8; discussion 608-9. PubMed ID: 7940156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with close or focally involved margins following breast-conserving surgery: treatment with reexcision or radiotherapy with increased dosage.
Monteau A; Sigal-Zafrani B; Kirova YM; Fourchotte V; Bollet MA; Vincent-Salomon A; Asselain B; Salmon RJ; Fourquet A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):1021-8. PubMed ID: 19386441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
