These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16510366)

  • 1. Congress ignores the parameters of the health exception. Judicial responses to congressional evidence and partial-birth abortion in Thewake of Stenberg v. Carhart.
    Bailey BJ
    J Leg Med; 2006 Mar; 27(1):71-85. PubMed ID: 16510366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
    Joersz M
    N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stenberg v. Carhart: have the states lost their power to regulate abortion?
    Gauthier AM
    New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(3):625-68. PubMed ID: 15212038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stenberg v. Carhart: women retain their right to choose.
    Berkowitz JF
    J Crim Law Criminol; 2001; 91(2):337-83. PubMed ID: 12774791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion.
    Heffernan L
    Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development of the undue burden standard in Stenberg v. Carhart: will proposed RU-486 legislation survive?
    Guenther H
    Indiana Law Rev; 2002; 35(3):1021-44. PubMed ID: 16211757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Justices reaffirm abortion access for emergencies.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 16429624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Partial birth" abortion and the health exception: protecting maternal health or risking abortion on demand?
    Glidewell G
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2001 Apr; 28(4):1089-150. PubMed ID: 12680381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Gordon A
    Harvard J Legis; 2004; 41(2):501-15. PubMed ID: 16596750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US Supreme Court to review "partial birth abortion" law.
    Tanne J
    BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7540):506. PubMed ID: 16513699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fourteenth Amendment unenumerated rights jurisprudence: an essay in response to Stenberg v. Carhart.
    Smolin DM
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 2001; 24(3):815-39. PubMed ID: 16594113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hope Clinic v. Ryan.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2001; 249():603-6. PubMed ID: 16482667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brief supports partial-birth abortion ban.
    Catholic Church. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops [USCCB]
    Origins; 2006 Jun; 36(4):58-63. PubMed ID: 16832962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Congressional control of federal court jurisdiction: the case study of abortion.
    Greenwood JS
    S C Law Rev; 2003; 54(4):1069-112. PubMed ID: 16493841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An inside look at partial birth abortion.
    Lowe LR
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998-1999; 24():327-57. PubMed ID: 16180289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Court and abortion: worse than you think.
    Dworkin R
    New York Rev Books; 2007 May; 54(9):20-1. PubMed ID: 17517997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The vagueness of partial-birth abortion bans: deconstruction or destruction?
    Rurka ML
    J Crim Law Criminol; 1999; 89(4):1233-68. PubMed ID: 14628850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. So-called "partial birth abortion" bans: bad medicine? Maybe. Bad law? Definitely!
    Massie AM
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-80. PubMed ID: 11902179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
    Gough AD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. State's partial-birth abortion ban supported.
    Chopko M; Moses M
    Origins; 2000 Mar; 29(38):617-23. PubMed ID: 11913443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.