These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16510397)

  • 1. Parameter sensitivity and uncertainty of the forest carbon flux model FORUG: a Monte Carlo analysis.
    Verbeeck H; Samson R; Verdonck F; Lemeur R
    Tree Physiol; 2006 Jun; 26(6):807-17. PubMed ID: 16510397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainty in predictions of forest carbon dynamics: separating driver error from model error.
    Spadavecchia L; Williams M; Law BE
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Jul; 21(5):1506-22. PubMed ID: 21830698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying influences on model uncertainty: an application using a forest carbon budget model.
    Smith JE; Heath LS
    Environ Manage; 2001 Feb; 27(2):253-67. PubMed ID: 11116383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating uncertainty in terrestrial critical loads and their exceedances at four sites in the UK.
    Skeffington RA; Whitehead PG; Heywood E; Hall JR; Wadsworth RA; Reynolds B
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Sep; 382(2-3):199-213. PubMed ID: 17555799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parameter sensitivity analysis of the FORUG model using the Monte Carlo simulation technique.
    Verbeeck H; Samson R; Verdonck F; Lemeur R
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2004; 69(2):317-20. PubMed ID: 15560250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Component carbon fluxes and their contribution to ecosystem carbon exchange in a pine forest: an assessment based on eddy covariance measurements and an integrated model.
    Wang KY; Kellomäki S; Zha TS; Peltola H
    Tree Physiol; 2004 Jan; 24(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 14652211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling annual production and carbon fluxes of a large managed temperate forest using forest inventories, satellite data and field measurements.
    Le Maire G; Davi H; Soudani K; François C; Le Dantec V; Dufrêne E
    Tree Physiol; 2005 Jul; 25(7):859-72. PubMed ID: 15870054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Design of dynamic simulation system for carbon cycle in forest ecosystem].
    Zhu JG; Yu XX; Zhang ZM; Wang C; Gan J; Wang XP; Li JH
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2009 Nov; 20(11):2603-9. PubMed ID: 20135989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data.
    Van Oijen M; Rougier J; Smith R
    Tree Physiol; 2005 Jul; 25(7):915-27. PubMed ID: 15870058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Net carbon exchange and its environmental affecting factors in a forest plantation in Badaling, Beijing of China].
    Tang X; Chen WJ; Li CY; Zha TS; Wu B; Wang XP; Jia X
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2013 Nov; 24(11):3057-64. PubMed ID: 24564132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DESPOT, a process-based tree growth model that allocates carbon to maximize carbon gain.
    Buckley TN; Roberts DW
    Tree Physiol; 2006 Feb; 26(2):129-44. PubMed ID: 16356910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimates of the distributions of forest ecosystem model inputs for deciduous forests of eastern North America.
    Radtke PJ; Burk TE; Bolstad PV
    Tree Physiol; 2001 May; 21(8):505-12. PubMed ID: 11359708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating parameters of a forest ecosystem C model with measurements of stocks and fluxes as joint constraints.
    Richardson AD; Williams M; Hollinger DY; Moore DJ; Dail DB; Davidson EA; Scott NA; Evans RS; Hughes H; Lee JT; Rodrigues C; Savage K
    Oecologia; 2010 Sep; 164(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 20390301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probabilistic biosphere modeling for the long-term safety assessment of geological disposal facilities for radioactive waste using first- and second-order Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ciecior W; Röhlig KJ; Kirchner G
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Oct; 190-191():10-19. PubMed ID: 29734123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flux partitioning in an old-growth forest: seasonal and interannual dynamics.
    Falk M; Wharton S; Schroeder M; Ustin S; Paw U KT
    Tree Physiol; 2008 Apr; 28(4):509-20. PubMed ID: 18244938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Impacts of uncertainty in data processing on estimation of CO2 flux components].
    Liu M; He HL; Yu GR; Sun XM; Zhu XD; Zhang L; Zhao XQ; Wang HM; Shi PL; Han SJ
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2010 Sep; 21(9):2389-96. PubMed ID: 21265165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing drug distribution in tissues expressing P-glycoprotein using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling: identification of important model parameters through global sensitivity analysis.
    Fenneteau F; Li J; Nekka F
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2009 Dec; 36(6):495-522. PubMed ID: 19847628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative information contributions of model vs. data to short- and long-term forecasts of forest carbon dynamics.
    Weng E; Luo Y
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Jul; 21(5):1490-505. PubMed ID: 21830697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modelling environmental controls on ecosystem photosynthesis and the carbon isotope composition of ecosystem-respired CO2 in a coastal Douglas-fir forest.
    Cai T; Flanagan LB; Jassal RS; Black TA
    Plant Cell Environ; 2008 Apr; 31(4):435-53. PubMed ID: 18182019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Simulation of water and carbon fluxes in harvard forest area based on data assimilation method].
    Zhang TL; Sun R; Zhang RH; Zhang L
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2013 Oct; 24(10):2746-54. PubMed ID: 24483066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.