These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16510953)
1. Dosimetric validation of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for photon dose calculation: fundamental characterization in water. Fogliata A; Nicolini G; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Cozzi L Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1421-38. PubMed ID: 16510953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE. Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams. Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations. Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation. Van Esch A; Tillikainen L; Pyykkonen J; Tenhunen M; Helminen H; Siljamäki S; Alakuijala J; Paiusco M; Lori M; Huyskens DP Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA. Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of photon dose calculation algorithms on expected dose distributions in lungs under different respiratory phases. Fogliata A; Nicolini G; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Winkler P; Cozzi L Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2375-90. PubMed ID: 18421117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries. Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Collapsed cone convolution and analytical anisotropic algorithm dose calculations compared to VMC++ Monte Carlo simulations in clinical cases. Hasenbalg F; Neuenschwander H; Mini R; Born EJ Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3679-91. PubMed ID: 17664570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods. Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of Varian's AAA algorithm with focus on lung treatments. Rønde HS; Hoffmann L Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 18803058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental verification of a commercial Monte Carlo-based dose calculation module for high-energy photon beams. Künzler T; Fotina I; Stock M; Georg D Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(24):7363-77. PubMed ID: 19934489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation and experimental validation of the high dose rate stereotactic treatment mode at Varian accelerators. Hoffmann L Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 18759143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Basic dosimetric verification in water of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for Varian, Elekta and Siemens linacs. Cozzi L; Nicolini G; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Glashörster M; Schiefer H; Fogliata A Z Med Phys; 2008; 18(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 18705613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of different lung densities on the accuracy of various radiotherapy dose calculation methods: implications for tumour coverage. Aarup LR; Nahum AE; Zacharatou C; Juhler-Nøttrup T; Knöös T; Nyström H; Specht L; Wieslander E; Korreman SS Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jun; 91(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 19297051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo simulation of the photon beam characteristics from medical linear accelerators. Kim HK; Han SJ; Kim JL; Kim BH; Chang SY; Lee JK Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):510-3. PubMed ID: 16644954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo evaluation of RapidArc oropharynx treatment planning strategies for sparing of midline structures. Bush K; Zavgorodni S; Gagne I; Townson R; Ansbacher W; Beckham W Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4465-79. PubMed ID: 20668338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm. Newhauser W; Fontenot J; Zheng Y; Polf J; Titt U; Koch N; Zhang X; Mohan R Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4569-84. PubMed ID: 17634651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Monte Carlo evaluation of RapidArc dose calculations for oropharynx radiotherapy. Gagne IM; Ansbacher W; Zavgorodni S; Popescu C; Beckham WA Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7167-85. PubMed ID: 19033640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation. Chow JC; Jiang R; Leung MK J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 12(1):3424. PubMed ID: 21330989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]