430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16510959)
1. Experimental determination of beam quality factors, kQ, for two types of Farmer chamber in a 10 MV photon and a 175 MeV proton beam.
Medin J; Ross CK; Klassen NV; Palmans H; Grusell E; Grindborg JE
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1503-21. PubMed ID: 16510959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of water calorimetry in a 180 MeV scanned pulsed proton beam including an experimental determination of kQ for a Farmer chamber.
Medin J
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(12):3287-98. PubMed ID: 20484778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absorbed dose to water determination with ionization chamber dosimetry and calorimetry in restricted neutron, photon, proton and heavy-ion radiation fields.
Brede HJ; Greif KD; Hecker O; Heeg P; Heese J; Jones DT; Kluge H; Schardt D
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3667-82. PubMed ID: 16861773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consistency in reference radiotherapy dosimetry: resolution of an apparent conundrum when (60)Co is the reference quality for charged-particle and photon beams.
Andreo P; Wulff J; Burns DT; Palmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6593-621. PubMed ID: 24018471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calorimetric determination of kQ factors for NE 2561 and NE 2571 ionization chambers in 5 cm x 5 cm and 10 cm x 10 cm radiotherapy beams of 8 MV and 16 MV photons.
Krauss A; Kapsch RP
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(20):6243-59. PubMed ID: 17921583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chamber-quality factors in 60Co for three plane-parallel chambers for the dosimetry of electrons, protons and heavier charged particles: PENELOPE Monte Carlo simulations.
Panettieri V; Sempau J; Andreo P
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(21):5917-26. PubMed ID: 18836218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reference dose determination in 60Co and high-energy radiotherapy photon beams by using Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers - an experimental investigation.
Swanpalmer J
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 May; 6(4):045003. PubMed ID: 33444264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of w values for carbon beams in air, using a graphite calorimeter.
Sakama M; Kanai T; Fukumura A; Abe K
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(5):1111-30. PubMed ID: 19174597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental determination of
Medin J; Andreo P; Palmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(5):. PubMed ID: 35081517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetry study comparing NCS report-2 versus IAEA report TRS-398 for high energy photon beams.
Attalla EM; Khaled NE; Abou-Elenein HS; Elsayed AA
Gulf J Oncolog; 2008 Jan; (3):25-31. PubMed ID: 20084794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo correction factors for a Farmer 0.6 cm3 ion chamber dose measurement in the build-up region of the 6 MV clinical beam.
Pena J; Sánchez-Doblado F; Capote R; Terrón JA; Gómez F
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1523-32. PubMed ID: 16510960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the p(dis) correction factor for cylindrical chambers.
Andreo P
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):L9-16; author reply L17-9. PubMed ID: 20157227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. LET dependence of GafChromic films and an ion chamber in low-energy proton dosimetry.
Kirby D; Green S; Palmans H; Hugtenburg R; Wojnecki C; Parker D
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(2):417-33. PubMed ID: 20019399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetry of clinical neutron and proton beams: an overview of recommendations.
Vynckier S; ;
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):565-72. PubMed ID: 15353710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental validation of beam quality correction factors for proton beams.
Gomà C; Hofstetter-Boillat B; Safai S; Vörös S
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3207-16. PubMed ID: 25813370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reference dosimetry in a scanned pulsed proton beam using ionisation chambers and a Faraday cup.
Lorin S; Grusell E; Tilly N; Medin J; Kimstrand P; Glimelius B
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3519-29. PubMed ID: 18552418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct determination of k
Osinga-Blättermann JM; Brons S; Greilich S; Jäkel O; Krauss A
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2033-2054. PubMed ID: 28212111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proton dosimetry intercomparison based on the ICRU report 59 protocol.
Vatnitsky S; Moyers M; Miller D; Abell G; Slater JM; Pedroni E; Coray A; Mazal A; Newhauser W; Jaekel O; Heese J; Fukumura A; Futami Y; Verhey L; Daftari I; Grusell E; Molokanov A; Bloch C
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jun; 51(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10435822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
