These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16511674)

  • 1. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.
    Aldrich JE; Duran E; Dunlop P; Mayo JR
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 16511674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Local diagnostic reference levels for typical radiographic procedures.
    Tonkopi E; Daniels C; Gale MJ; Schofield SC; Sorhaindo VA; Vanlarkin JL
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2012 Nov; 63(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 22136965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient dose and associated exposure parameters in pelvic x-ray examinations: dependence on radiographic system.
    Welarathna S; Velautham S; Sarasanandarajah S
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2024 Aug; 63(3):433-442. PubMed ID: 39020221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environment.
    Andriole KP; Luth DM; Gould RG
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():124-6. PubMed ID: 12105711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comprehensive optimization process of paranasal sinus radiography.
    Saarakkala S; Nironen K; Hermunen H; Aarnio J; Heikkinen JO
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 19235578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction.
    Hufton AP; Doyle SM; Carty HM
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 71(842):186-99. PubMed ID: 9579183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program.
    Heddson B; Rönnow K; Olsson M; Miller D
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 17383841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital storage phosphor radiography. Doses and image quality].
    Salvini E; Pedroli G; Montanari G; Pastori R; Crespi A; Zincone G
    Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):847-51. PubMed ID: 8041940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transition from screen-film to digital radiography: evolution of patient radiation doses at projection radiography.
    Vaño E; Fernández JM; Ten JI; Prieto C; González L; Rodríguez R; de las Heras H
    Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):461-6. PubMed ID: 17356174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
    Geijer H; Beckman K; Jonsson B; Andersson T; Persliden J
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies.
    Fischbach F; Ricke J; Freund T; Werk M; Spors B; Baumann C; Pech MJ; Felix R
    Invest Radiol; 2002 Nov; 37(11):609-14. PubMed ID: 12393973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
    Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography.
    Gruber M; Uffmann M; Weber M; Prokop M; Balassy C; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Jul; 16(7):1544-50. PubMed ID: 16404566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low-dose radiography of scoliosis in children. A comparison of methods.
    Kalmar JA; Jones JP; Merritt CR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Apr; 19(7):818-23. PubMed ID: 8202801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.