These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16511674)

  • 41. Optimizing digital radiography of children.
    Willis CE
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 19345030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems.
    Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Experiences with computed radiography: can we afford the cost?
    Bragg DG; Murray KA; Tripp D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):935-41. PubMed ID: 9308439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Strategies for dose reduction in ordinary radiographic examinations using CR and DR.
    Willis CE
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S196-200; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Digital radiography of the chest: detector techniques and performance parameters.
    Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Eisenhuber E; Prokop M
    J Thorac Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(3):124-37. PubMed ID: 12867810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.
    Willis CE
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Mar; 20(1):1-3; author reply 4-5. PubMed ID: 17410404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
    Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Quality control--patient doses--guidance dose levels from diagnostic radiology in Tunisia].
    Ben Omrane L; Chahed N; Hammou A; Mtimet S
    Tunis Med; 2007 Jun; 85(6):465-8. PubMed ID: 17644898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Computed radiography versus mobile direct radiography for bedside chest radiographs: impact of dose on image quality and reader agreement.
    De Boo DW; Weber M; Deurloo EE; Streekstra GJ; Freling NJ; Dongelmans DA; Schaefer-Prokop CM
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Sep; 66(9):826-32. PubMed ID: 21570679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Patient dose and associated exposure parameters in pelvic x-ray examinations: dependence on radiographic system.
    Welarathna S; Velautham S; Sarasanandarajah S
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39020221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography.
    Bosmans H; De Hauwere A; Lemmens K; Zanca F; Thierens H; Van Ongeval C; Van Herck K; Van Steen A; Martens P; Bleyen L; Vande Putte G; Kellen E; Mortier G; Van Limbergen E
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Oct; 23(10):2891-8. PubMed ID: 23689308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of digital radiography on emergency department radiographic examinations.
    Lee B; Junewick J; Luttenton C
    Emerg Radiol; 2006 May; 12(4):158-9. PubMed ID: 16601999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Computed radiography as a gamma ray detector--dose response and applications.
    O'Keeffe DS; McLeod RW
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(16):3559-72. PubMed ID: 15446787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Assessment of Patient Radiation Dose during Conventional Diagnostic X-ray Examinations in Three Public Hospitals in Northern Jordan using TLDs.
    Ababneh ZQ; Ababneh AM; Bani Hani MS; Ababneh RS; Aljarrah KM
    Health Phys; 2020 Jun; 118(6):593-599. PubMed ID: 32348097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dose Optimization in Lumbar Spine Radiographic Examination by Air Gap Method at CR and DR Systems: A Phantom Study.
    Chan CTP; Fung KKL
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2015 Mar; 46(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 31052066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Detection of simulated inflicted metaphyseal fractures in a fetal pig model: image optimization and dose reduction with computed radiography.
    Kleinman PL; Zurakowski D; Strauss KJ; Cleveland RH; Perez-Rosello JM; Nichols DP; Zou KH; Kleinman PK
    Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 18430873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.