These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16511674)

  • 61. Low-dose digital computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging.
    Kogutt MS; Jones JP; Perkins DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 3262278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. COMPARISON OF RADIATION EXPOSURE TO THE PATIENT AND CONTRAST DETAIL RESOLUTIONS ACROSS LOW DOSE 2D/3D SLOT SCANNER AND TWO CONVENTIONAL DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS.
    Abdi AJ; Mussmann B; Mackenzie A; Klaerke B; Andersen PE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(2):252-265. PubMed ID: 30809672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Measurement of focal spot size with slit camera using computed radiography and flat-panel based digital detectors.
    Rong XJ; Krugh KT; Shepard SJ; Geiser WR
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1768-75. PubMed ID: 12906194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Comparison of testing of collimator and beam alignment, focal spot size with slit camera, and tube current consistency using computed radiography and conventional screen-film systems.
    Meechai T; Chousangsuntorn K; Owasirikul W; Mongkolsuk M; Iampa W
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):160-169. PubMed ID: 31095873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The effect of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) on patient radiation doses for examination of the lateral lumbar spine.
    Weatherburn GC; Bryan S
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 72(858):534-45. PubMed ID: 10560334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients.
    Jablanovic D; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Damjanov N; Seric S; Radak-Perovic M; Arandjic D; Maksimovic R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 23185070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
    Freedman M
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Pediatric high KV/filtered airway radiographs: comparison of CR and film-screen systems.
    Nickoloff EL; Berdon WE; Lu ZF; Ruzal-Shapiro CB; So JC; Dutta AK
    Pediatr Radiol; 2002 Jul; 32(7):476-84. PubMed ID: 12107580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Performance evaluation of two computed radiography systems and patient dose in pelvic examination.
    Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25836691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Clinical evaluation of digital radiography based on a large-area cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector compared with screen-film radiography for skeletal system and abdomen.
    Okamura T; Tanaka S; Koyama K; Norihumi N; Daikokuya H; Matsuoka T; Kishimoto K; Hatagawa M; Kudoh H; Yamada R
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Jul; 12(7):1741-7. PubMed ID: 12111065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Performance of automatic exposure control on dose and image quality: comparison between slot-scanning and flat-panel digital radiography systems.
    Boissonnat G; Morichau-Beauchant P; Reshef A; Villa C; Désauté P; Simon AC
    Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1162-1184. PubMed ID: 36069636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Assessment of patient doses in CR examinations throughout a large health region.
    Thakur Y; Bjarnason TA; Hammerstrom K; Marchinkow L; Koch T; Aldrich JE
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Feb; 25(1):189-95. PubMed ID: 21547516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Characteristic evaluation and clinical usefulness of dose area product meter at radiography].
    Nakamae M; Tatsumi Y; Morioka S; Masuda S; Kitanaka Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1448-53. PubMed ID: 22104238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography.
    MacMahon H; Xu XW; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Yoshimura H; Doi K; Carlin M; Kano A; Yao L; Abe K
    Radiographics; 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 8316670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Dose-image optimisation in digital radiology with a direct digital detector: an example applied to pelvic examinations.
    Persliden J; Beckman KW; Geijer H; Andersson T
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Jun; 12(6):1584-8. PubMed ID: 12042972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Some aspects on radiation protection in conventional and digital radiology in Romania.
    Milu C; Dumitrescu A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):346-9. PubMed ID: 18381334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Local reference dose evaluation in conventional radiography examinations in Iran.
    Shirin Shandiz M; Bahreyni Toosi MT; Farsi S; Yaghobi K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4550. PubMed ID: 24710442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.