163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16512097)
21. Image quality of digital and film radiographs in applications sent to the Dental Insurance Office in Sweden for treatment approval.
Hellén-Halme K; Johansson PM; Håkansson J; Petersson A
Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 15272512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Panoramic dental radiography using a charge-coupled device receptor.
Farman AG; Farman TT
J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):166-8. PubMed ID: 9735460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Panoramic radiography: digital technology fosters efficiency.
Benson BW; Liang H; Flint DJ
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011; 32 Spec No 4():6-8. PubMed ID: 22195340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dental radiology: capture your image.
Brocklebank LM
Dent Update; 1998 Apr; 25(3):94-6, 98, 100-2. PubMed ID: 9791202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quality of digital panoramic radiography in a newly established dental school.
Kullman L; Joseph B
Swed Dent J; 2006; 30(4):165-70. PubMed ID: 17243444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system.
Parissis N; Angelopoulos C; Mantegari S; Karamanis S; Masood F; Tsirlis A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jan; 11(1):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20098961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Will the new highly intensifying film-screen combination of the Kodak T-MAT G/Lanex Regular meet the qualitative requirements of the lateral teleroentgenogram and orthopantomogram?].
Schulz D; Bührmann K; Plein-Jakobs E; Jakobs W
Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1988 Jun; 49(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 3165364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems.
Borg E; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 9446978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Are children's dental panoramic tomographs and lateral cephalometric radiographs sufficiently optimized?
Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Ekholm M; Haukka J; Evälahti M; Waltimo-Sirén J
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Feb; 38(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 26483417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
Molander B
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dental digital radiography.
Moore WS
Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 12046403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Exposure reduction and image quality in orthodontic radiology: a review of the literature.
Taylor TS; Ackerman RJ; Hardman PK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Jan; 93(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 3276147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [A comparative study of analog and digital intraoral x-ray image detector systems].
Blendl C; Stengel C; Zdunczyk S
Rofo; 2000 Jun; 172(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 10916550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical evaluation of dose reduction on image quality of panoramic radiographs.
Alkurt MT; Peker I; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jul; 9(5):34-41. PubMed ID: 18633467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiation dose-reduction techniques in North American dental schools.
Geist JR; Katz JO
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Apr; 93(4):496-505. PubMed ID: 12029291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.
Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cross-sectional tomograms obtained with four panoramic radiographic units in the assessment of implant site measurements.
Peltola JS; Mattila M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 15585805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
