These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16512282)

  • 1. Frequency format facilitates reasoning in simple numerical tasks.
    Misuraca R; Cardaci M
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Dec; 97(3):691-5. PubMed ID: 16512282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children's quantitative Bayesian inferences from natural frequencies and number of chances.
    Pighin S; Girotto V; Tentori K
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():164-175. PubMed ID: 28692831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adding up to good Bayesian reasoning: Problem format manipulations and individual skill differences.
    Brase GL; Hill WT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Apr; 146(4):577-591. PubMed ID: 28383994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A set for relational reasoning: Facilitation of algebraic modeling by a fraction task.
    DeWolf M; Bassok M; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Dec; 152():351-366. PubMed ID: 27522528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural mapping in statistical word problems: A relational reasoning approach to Bayesian inference.
    Johnson ED; Tubau E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):964-971. PubMed ID: 27678378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-trend-related differences in tasks involving conjunctive probabilistic reasoning.
    Chiesi F; Gronchi G; Primi C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Sep; 62(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 18778147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Now you Bayes, now you don't: effects of set-problem and frequency-format mental representations on statistical reasoning.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1465-73. PubMed ID: 25711182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative information presentation and gender: an interaction effect.
    Togo DF; Hood JN
    J Gen Psychol; 1992 Apr; 119(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 1506846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual spatial representation in mathematical problem solving by deaf and hearing students.
    Blatto-Vallee G; Kelly RR; Gaustad MG; Porter J; Fonzi J
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2007; 12(4):432-48. PubMed ID: 17548803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When and for whom do frequencies facilitate performance? On the role of numerical literacy.
    Hill WT; Brase GL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2343-68. PubMed ID: 22630143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to train your Bayesian: a problem-representation transfer rather than a format-representation shift explains training effects.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 25283723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Children can solve Bayesian problems: the role of representation in mental computation.
    Zhu L; Gigerenzer G
    Cognition; 2006 Jan; 98(3):287-308. PubMed ID: 16399266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defective number module or impaired access? Numerical magnitude processing in first graders with mathematical difficulties.
    De Smedt B; Gilmore CK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Feb; 108(2):278-92. PubMed ID: 20974477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measures of Bayesian Reasoning Performance on 'Normal' and 'Natural' Frequency Tasks.
    Stock R; Fisk JE; Montgomery C
    J Gen Psychol; 2016; 143(3):185-214. PubMed ID: 27410053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Another chance for good reasoning.
    Pighin S; Tentori K; Girotto V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1995-2002. PubMed ID: 28265865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidencing How Experience and Problem Format Affect Probabilistic Reasoning Through Interaction Analysis.
    Reani M; Davies A; Peek N; Jay C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1548. PubMed ID: 31333551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Domain-specific and domain-general changes in children's development of number comparison.
    Holloway ID; Ansari D
    Dev Sci; 2008 Sep; 11(5):644-9. PubMed ID: 18801118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How do people apprehend large numerosities?
    Sophian C; Chu Y
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):460-78. PubMed ID: 18082157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subtraction in addition to addition: dual task performance improves when tasks are presented to separate hemispheres.
    Liederman J
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1986 Oct; 8(5):486-502. PubMed ID: 3805249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facilitating effect of natural frequencies: size does not matter.
    Misuraca R; Carmeci FA; Pravettoni G; Cardaci M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Apr; 108(2):422-30. PubMed ID: 19544947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.