These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16512884)

  • 21. Cervical column morphology in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and mandibular overjet.
    Sonnesen L; Kjaer I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):427.e7-12. PubMed ID: 17920492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relationship between the masticatory muscles and mandibular skeleton in mandibular prognathism with and without asymmetry.
    Kwon TG; Lee KH; Park HS; Ryoo HM; Kim HJ; Lee SH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 65(8):1538-43. PubMed ID: 17656280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relationship between bilateral condylar bone change and mandibular morphology: a study using morphometry.
    Alkhamrah B; Yamada K; Yamaki M; Ali IM; Hanada K
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 12353938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nevoid Basal cell carcinoma syndrome: a cephalometric study of patients and controls.
    Leonardi R; Licciardello V; Santarelli A; Ciavarella D; Bolouri S; Härle F; Caltabiano M; Lo Muzio L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 20(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 19165028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Thin-plate spline graphical analysis of the mandible in mandibular prognathism.
    Chang HF; Chang HP; Liu PH; Chang CH
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2002 Nov; 101(11):790-4. PubMed ID: 12517060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of the centroid method of occlusion for studying the vertical and horizontal relationship of the mandible and maxilla.
    Murata S
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 17873144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A cephalometric analysis of the cranial base and frontal part of the face in patients with mandibular prognathism.
    Cutović T; Jović N; Stojanović L; Radojicić J; Mladenović I; Matijević S; Kozomara R
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jun; 71(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 25039106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Thin-plate spline analysis of mandibular growth.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Apr; 71(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 11302593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Components of soft tissue deformations in subjects with untreated angle's Class III malocclusions: thin-plate spline analysis.
    Singh GD; McNamara JA; Lozanoff S
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1998; 18(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 10100051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mandibular prognathism in Japanese families ascertained through orthognathically treated patients.
    Watanabe M; Suda N; Ohyama K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):466-70. PubMed ID: 16214628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A morphometric analysis of the craniofacial configuration in achondroplasia.
    Cohen MM; Walker GF; Phillips C
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol Suppl; 1985; 1():139-65. PubMed ID: 3877092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of mandibular rami width in patients with prognathism and retrognathia.
    Ribeiro DP; Gandelmann IH; Medeiros PJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1506-9. PubMed ID: 16982309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of two skeletal and dental class III cases: 10 years postretention.
    Doğan S; Sabah ME
    World J Orthod; 2004; 5(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15615139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of 2D:4D in subjects with anteroposterior mandibular dysplasia.
    Premkumar S; Gurumurthy B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):582-5. PubMed ID: 24309331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Analysis of variation of sagittal position of the jaw bones in skeletal Class III malocclusion].
    Stojanović Z; Nikolić P; Nikodijević A; Milić J; Duka M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2012 Dec; 69(12):1039-45. PubMed ID: 23424956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing cervical spine and craniofacial morphology in Class II and Class III malocclusions: A geometric morphometric approach.
    Sandoval C; Díaz A; Manríquez G
    Cranio; 2024 Jul; 42(4):450-460. PubMed ID: 34623215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Morphometric analyses of the mandible in prepubertal craniofacial microsomia patients treated with an inverted-L osteotomy.
    Cerajewska TL; Singh GD
    Clin Anat; 2002 Mar; 15(2):100-7. PubMed ID: 11877787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Skeletal components of class III malocclusions and compensation mechanisms.
    Spalj S; Mestrovic S; Lapter Varga M; Slaj M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Aug; 35(8):629-37. PubMed ID: 18699972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The morphology of the base of the cranium in prognathism. A cephalometric study of adult patients].
    Dolci G; Cordaro L; Cordaro M
    Minerva Stomatol; 1991 Dec; 40(12):761-8. PubMed ID: 1815124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Chincup treatment modifies the mandibular shape in children with prognathism.
    Alarcón JA; Bastir M; Rosas A; Molero J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jul; 140(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 21724085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.