These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16512889)

  • 21. Influence of surface layer removal of shade guide tabs on the measured color by spectrophotometer and spectroradiometer.
    Kim JC; Yu B; Lee YK
    J Dent; 2008 Dec; 36(12):1061-7. PubMed ID: 18930577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of visual and spectrophotometric shade analyses: a clinical comparison of 3758 teeth.
    Derdilopoulou FV; Zantner C; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(4):414-6. PubMed ID: 17695875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Color attributes and accuracy of Vita-based manufacturers' shade guides.
    Yap AU
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):266-71. PubMed ID: 9863448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the optical influence of core build-up composites on all-ceramic materials.
    Li Q; Yu H; Wang YN
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 18606444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Shade distribution of commercial resin composites and color difference with shade guide tabs.
    Park SK; Lee YK
    Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):335-9. PubMed ID: 17993033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The measurement of tooth whiteness by image analysis and spectrophotometry: a comparison.
    Guan YH; Lath DL; Lilley TH; Willmot DR; Marlow I; Brook AH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Jan; 32(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 15634295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Metameric effect between natural teeth and the shade tabs of a shade guide.
    Corcodel N; Helling S; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Jun; 118(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 20572867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices.
    Kim-Pusateri S; Brewer JD; Davis EL; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19231572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. CIE L*a*b*: comparison of digital images obtained photographically by manual and automatic modes.
    Takatsui F; Andrade MF; Neisser MP; Barros LA; Loffredo Lde C
    Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 23019087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Color comparison of two shade guides.
    Paravina RD; Powers JM; Fay RM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 11887603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of a common shade guide to test the perception of differences in the shades and value by members of the dental team.
    Geary JL; Kinirons MJ
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Jul; 6(3):107-10. PubMed ID: 11819873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro model to evaluate reliability and accuracy of a dental shade-matching instrument.
    Kim-Pusateri S; Brewer JD; Dunford RG; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 18021823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction.
    Da Silva JD; Park SE; Weber HP; Ishikawa-Nagai S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 18456047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spectrophotometric evaluation of color match to VITA classical shade guide of four different veneering porcelain systems for metal ceramic restorations.
    Fazi G; Vichi A; Corciolani G; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2009 Feb; 22(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 19281108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Color differences between light-cured composite resin made shade guides and manufactured shade guides].
    Hosoya Y; Goto G
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Aug; 90(8):1077-87. PubMed ID: 2152006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dental shade matching using a digital camera.
    Tam WK; Lee HJ
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40 Suppl 2():e3-10. PubMed ID: 22713739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Human-eye versus computerized color matching.
    Yap AU; Sim CP; Loh WL; Teo JH
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):358-63. PubMed ID: 10823085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Color analysis of Vita shade guide].
    Wu X; Song S
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1996 Jul; 31(4):227-9. PubMed ID: 9592275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Agreement between digital image analysis and clinical spectrophotometer in CIEL*C*h° coordinate differences and total color difference (ΔE) measurements of dental ceramic shade tabs.
    Farah RI
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(2):234-45. PubMed ID: 27092349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison between a new visual method of colour matching by intraoral camera and conventional visual and spectrometric methods.
    Lasserre JF; Pop-Ciutrila IS; Colosi HA
    J Dent; 2011 Dec; 39 Suppl 3():e29-36. PubMed ID: 22101123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.