BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16513312)

  • 1. Between-centre variability versus variability over time in DXA whole body measurements evaluated using a whole body phantom.
    Louis O; Verlinde S; Thomas M; De Schepper J
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):431-4. PubMed ID: 16513312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.
    Aasen G; Fagertun H; Halse J
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(8):659-66. PubMed ID: 17101558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulated change in body fatness affects Hologic QDR 4500A whole body and central DXA bone measures.
    Evans EM; Mojtahedi MC; Kessinger RB; Misic MM
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 16931350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can accurately and nondestructively measure the body composition of small, free-living rodents.
    Stevenson KT; van Tets IG
    Physiol Biochem Zool; 2008; 81(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 18419562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of body composition measurements obtained by two fan-beam DXA instruments.
    Sakai Y; Ito H; Meno T; Numata M; Jingu S
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 16785080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Solid anthropomorphic infant whole-body DXA phantom: design, evaluation, and multisite testing.
    Shypailo RJ; Ellis KJ
    Pediatr Res; 2013 Nov; 74(5):486-93. PubMed ID: 23999072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone mass in young women is dependent on lean body mass.
    Kerr DA; Papalia S; Morton A; Dick I; Dhaliwal S; Prince RL
    J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 17574465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes.
    Bilsborough JC; Greenway K; Opar D; Livingstone S; Cordy J; Coutts AJ
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(19):1821-8. PubMed ID: 24914773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A DXA Whole Body Composition Cross-Calibration Experience: Evaluation With Humans, Spine, and Whole Body Phantoms.
    Krueger D; Libber J; Sanfilippo J; Yu HJ; Horvath B; Miller CG; Binkley N
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 26071169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry total and regional body composition measurements using different scanning positions and definitions of regions.
    Lohman M; Tallroth K; Kettunen JA; Marttinen MT
    Metabolism; 2009 Nov; 58(11):1663-8. PubMed ID: 19632696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of diagnostic radioisotopes and radiographic contrast media on measurements of lumbar spine bone mineral density and body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Sala A; Webber C; Halton J; Morrison J; Beaumont L; Zietak A; Barr R
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 16731437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of HIV infection on total body composition in treatment-naive men evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparison of 90 untreated HIV-infected men to 241 controls.
    Delpierre C; Bonnet E; Marion-Latard F; Aquilina C; Obadia M; Marchou B; Massip P; Perret B; Bernard J
    J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 17888698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is discordance in bone measurements affected by body composition or anthropometry? A comparative study between peripheral and central devices.
    Saarelainen J; Rikkonen T; Honkanen R; Kröger H; Tuppurainen M; Niskanen L; Jurvelin JS
    J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 17451985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition and aging in a population-based older cohort.
    Shaw KA; Srikanth VK; Fryer JL; Blizzard L; Dwyer T; Venn AJ
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2007 Feb; 31(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 16788568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do Textiles Impact DXA Bone Density or Body Composition Results?
    Siglinsky E; Binkley N; Krueger D
    J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(2):303-307. PubMed ID: 28988694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Body composition of female wheelchair athletes.
    Sutton L; Wallace J; Goosey-Tolfrey V; Scott M; Reilly T
    Int J Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 30(4):259-65. PubMed ID: 19288390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DXA body composition corrective factors between Hologic Discovery models to conduct multicenter studies.
    Sutter T; Duboeuf F; Chapurlat R; Cortet B; Lespessailles E; Roux JP
    Bone; 2021 Jan; 142():115683. PubMed ID: 33045389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A pilot study of body composition and bone mineral density in healthy men from Argentina.
    Seijo M; Deferrari JM; Bagur A; Fernández MC; Mastaglia SR; Parisi MS; Oliveri B
    J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 17662629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Body composition analysis by leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in non-obese and obese individuals.
    Boneva-Asiova Z; Boyanov MA
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2008 Nov; 10(11):1012-8. PubMed ID: 18435776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precision of periprosthetic bone mineral density measurements using Hologic Windows versus DOS-based analysis software.
    Shetty NR; Hamer AJ; Stockley I; Eastell R; Wilkinson JM
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):363-6. PubMed ID: 16931357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.