These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16513575)

  • 1. The role of eye movements in lateralised word recognition.
    Hyönä J; Koivisto M
    Laterality; 2006 Mar; 11(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 16513575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lateralised covert attention in word identification.
    Calvo MG; Nummenmaa L
    Laterality; 2009 Mar; 14(2):178-95. PubMed ID: 18777245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: the effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields.
    Ellis AW; Ansorge L; Lavidor M
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 17292463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation.
    Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 14967218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of bilateral eye movements on gist based false recognition in the DRM paradigm.
    Parker A; Dagnall N
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Apr; 63(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 17027132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of word class proportion on cerebral asymmetries for high- and low-imagery words.
    Chiarello C; Shears C; Liu S; Kacinik NA
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Feb; 57(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15629212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The importance of interhemispheric transfer for foveal vision: a factor that has been overlooked in theories of visual word recognition and object perception.
    Brysbaert M
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 14967210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Mar; 46(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 19576580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.
    Lavidor M; Hayes A; Shillcock R; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 14967214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facilitative orthographic neighborhood effects: the SERIOL model account.
    Whitney C; Lavidor M
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Nov; 51(3):179-213. PubMed ID: 16153629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional cueing effect in the identification of words and pseudowords of different length.
    Auclair L; Siéroff E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):445-63. PubMed ID: 12047053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of word length on hemispheric word recognition: evidence from unilateral and bilateral-redundant presentations.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME; Castles AE
    Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):447-52. PubMed ID: 12030486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why word length only matters in the left visual field.
    Whitney C; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(12):1680-8. PubMed ID: 15327934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No deficiency in left-to-right processing of words in dyslexia but evidence for enhanced visual crowding.
    Callens M; Whitney C; Tops W; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1803-17. PubMed ID: 23398310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.