222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16514578)
1. Lumbar disc replacement.
Petersilge CA
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2006 Mar; 10(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 16514578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical technique of lumbar artificial disc replacement with the Charité artificial disc.
Geisler FH
Neurosurgery; 2005 Jan; 56(1 Suppl):46-57; discussion 46-57. PubMed ID: 15799792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charité artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up.
Lemaire JP; Carrier H; Sariali el-H; Skalli W; Lavaste F
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Aug; 18(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 16021017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lumbar total disc replacement. Surgical technique.
Tropiano P; Huang RC; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP; Marnay T
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Mar; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 1():50-64. PubMed ID: 16510800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.
Zigler J; Delamarter R; Spivak JM; Linovitz RJ; Danielson GO; Haider TT; Cammisa F; Zuchermann J; Balderston R; Kitchel S; Foley K; Watkins R; Bradford D; Yue J; Yuan H; Herkowitz H; Geiger D; Bendo J; Peppers T; Sachs B; Girardi F; Kropf M; Goldstein J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. PubMed ID: 17495770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Established technique or experimental procedure?].
Schulte TL; Bullmann V; Lerner T; Halm HF; Liljenqvist U; Hackenberg L
Orthopade; 2005 Aug; 34(8):801-13. PubMed ID: 16028049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lumbar total disc replacement part I: rationale, biomechanics, and implant types.
Frelinghuysen P; Huang RC; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP
Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 15950689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Motion preservation following anteriorcervical discectomy.
Fehlings MG; Rabin D
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Sep; 13(3):297-8; discussion 298. PubMed ID: 20809720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Charité Artificial Disc: insertion technique.
Aryan HE; Acosta FL; Ames CP
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):637-50, vii. PubMed ID: 16326287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications.
Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Wiechert K; Korge A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(17):1923-32. PubMed ID: 16924209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients.
David T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 17413471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement.
Tournier C; Aunoble S; Le Huec JC; Lemaire JP; Tropiano P; Lafage V; Skalli W
Eur Spine J; 2007 Mar; 16(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 16960704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complications and strategies for revision surgery in total disc replacement.
Bertagnoli R; Zigler J; Karg A; Voigt S
Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 15950699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Total lumbar disc replacement.
Mayer HM
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Aug; 87(8):1029-37. PubMed ID: 16049234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lumbar disc arthroplasty compared with interbody fusion.
McCormick PC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Jan; 8(1):3-5; discussion 5-6. PubMed ID: 18173339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of two retroperitoneal surgical approaches for total disc arthroplasty of the lumbar spine.
Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Spivak JM; Goldstein J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 18197108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charité lumbar artificial disc replacement.
Wagner WH; Regan JJ; Leary SP; Lanman TH; Johnson JP; Rao RK; Cossman DV
J Vasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):1266-72. PubMed ID: 17145428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lumbar partial disc replacement.
Bertagnoli R; Karg A; Voigt S
Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 15950693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
