These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16514735)
1. Access to abortion pared at state level. Connolly C Washington Post; 2005 Aug; ():A1, A4. PubMed ID: 16514735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion consent law before Ind. legislature: doctor would say conception begins life. Martin D Washington Post; 2006 Feb; ():A10. PubMed ID: 16502549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court. Bertz RC West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Senate removes abortion option for young girls. Hulse C N Y Times Web; 2006 Jul; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 16909491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Resolving the abortion debate: compromise legislation, an analysis of the abortion policies of the United States, France and Germany. Hertberg BL Suffolk Transnatl Law R; 1993; 16(2):513-70. PubMed ID: 11659765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care. Bertuglia J Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. House passes abortion bill on minors. N Y Times Web; 2006 Sep; ():A23. PubMed ID: 17014048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law. Pirner RK; Williams LB Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study. Olmstead FH Vt Law Rev; 1982; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The viability of the trimester approach. Calder KA Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases. Ehrlich JS Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis. Linton PB Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution. Hayhurst MB Mont Law Rev; 1997; 58(2):565-98. PubMed ID: 16180294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Easing restrictions on minors' abortion rights. O'Keeffe J; Jones JM Issues Sci Technol; 1990; 7(4):74-80. PubMed ID: 11659333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last? Casurella JG; Schrock CT Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Under din of abortion debate, an experience shared quietly. Leland J N Y Times Web; 2005 Sep; ():A1, A28. PubMed ID: 16206432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion rights after South Dakota. McDonagh E Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases. Guggenheim M Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future. Joseph MA New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]