236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16514737)
21. Mental health--the right to refuse drug therapy under "emergency restraint statutes".
McGovern JJ
New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):509-40. PubMed ID: 11664602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Involuntary detention and treatment of the mentally ill: China's 2012 Mental Health Law.
Ding C
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(6):581-8. PubMed ID: 24630738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Behavioral health issue brief: outpatient civil commitment: year end report-2003.
McKinley A
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2003 Dec; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 14870735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The past, present and future of mental health law: a therapeutic jurisprudence analysis.
Allan A
Law Context; 2003; 20(2):24-53. PubMed ID: 16506344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Involuntary treatment of the mentally ill: autonomy is asking the wrong question.
Klein DW
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2004 Aug; (304):9-40. PubMed ID: 15503519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Stromberg CD; Stone AA
Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Liberty: human rights and mental health.
Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers
Common Law World Rev; 2002; 31(2):107-22. PubMed ID: 15973805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pennsylvania's new Mental Health Procedures Act: due process and the right to treatment for the mentally ill.
Lundeen PA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1977; 81(3):627-47. PubMed ID: 11664828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Protecting our mentally ill: a critique of the role of Indiana state courts in protecting involuntarily committed mental patients' right to refuse medication.
Goff ML
Indiana Law J; 2001; 76(4):983-1000. PubMed ID: 12455521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. New Jersey law gives judges options regarding the mentally ill.
Cardinale G
MD Advis; 2010; 3(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 21250529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Advance directives in a correctional setting.
Thomas DL; Watson JM
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):878-99. PubMed ID: 12455557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of clinical judgment in decision-making: the Mental Health Act 1986 (Vic.) and the Mental Health Review Board.
Pearson M
Ethical Hum Psychol Psychiatry; 2006; 8(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 16862718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Civil commitment in New York City: an analysis of practice.
McGraw BD
Pace Law Rev; 1985; 5(2):259-307. PubMed ID: 16998977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Therapeutic jurisprudence and outpatient commitment law: Kendra's Law and case study.
Perlin ML
Psychol Public Policy Law; 2003; 9(1-2):183-208. PubMed ID: 16700141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. State can make inmate sane enough to execute.
Liptak A
N Y Times Web; 2003 Feb; ():A1, A27. PubMed ID: 12812158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Analysis of the ethical consequences of the new proposed mental health legislation (Mental Health Bill 2004) for England and Wales].
Lepping P
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Oct; 67(10):726-8. PubMed ID: 16235141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An update on involuntary civil commitment to outpatient treatment.
Miller RD
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1992 Jan; 43(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 1544658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]