507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16514757)
1. The Stark Law: boon or boondoggle? An analysis of the prohibition on physician self-referrals.
Wales SD
Law Psychol Rev; 2003; 27():1-28. PubMed ID: 16514757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical and legal remedies to over-utilization of health care resources.
Verdirame KM
Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 25(4):1537-80. PubMed ID: 11654462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The patient has not been informed: a proposal for a physician conflict of interest disclosure law.
Michna C
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(2):495-528. PubMed ID: 11659864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?
Manchikanti L; McMahon EB
Pain Physician; 2007 Nov; 10(6):725-41. PubMed ID: 17987094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The physician as entrepreneur: state and federal restrictions on physician joint ventures.
Puryear JH
North Carol Law Rev; 1994 Nov; 73(1):293-328. PubMed ID: 11660072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Physician self-referral and joint venture prohibitions: necessary shield against abusive practices or overregulation?
Baumgartner MR
J Corp Law; 1994; 19(2):313-52. PubMed ID: 11652936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. U.S. limits doctors in their referrals.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1991 Jul; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How did physician ownership become a federal case? The Stark Amendments and their prospects.
Stout SM; Warner DC
HEC Forum; 2003 Jun; 15(2):171-87. PubMed ID: 12918284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A primer on the legal pitfalls of physician ownership and self-referral practices.
Steiner JE; Wagner MJ
J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Sep; 25(9):257-64. PubMed ID: 10123300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. When healers are entrepreneurs: a debate over costs and ethics.
Pear R; Eckholm E
N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun; ():1, 30. PubMed ID: 11646855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes to the federal Stark law that affect diagnostic imaging arrangements.
Stirewalt K
Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):49-51. PubMed ID: 20092174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The patient has not been informed: a proposal for a physician conflict of interest disclosure law.
Michna C
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1994 May; (183):9-42. PubMed ID: 10134665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fraud and abuse. Understanding the Stark II proposed regulations.
Davis JP
Healthc Financ Manage; 1998 Apr; 52(4):65-9. PubMed ID: 10178067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stark Law changes are on the horizon.
Armon BD
Del Med J; 2009 Aug; 81(8):293-4. PubMed ID: 19813513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surfing Stark II: prohibition against self-referrals.
Swibel HJ; Zaremski MJ
Physician Exec; 1995 Feb; 21(2):11-5. PubMed ID: 10140213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. "Stark" reality: self-referral rule holds risk and opportunity.
Lebowitz PH
Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(5):34-9. PubMed ID: 11680255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Buyer beware: complying with amended stark and anti-kickback regulations.
Klein SR; Fox SJ
J Healthc Inf Manag; 2008; 22(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 19266987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Doctors' investments in home care grow, raising fears of ethical swamp.
Meier B
N Y Times Web; 1993 Mar; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Stark truth. Government tries to make sense of long and complex law.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2004 Jun; 100(6):37-8. PubMed ID: 15267024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. How much will Congress relax the self-referral law?
Pretzer M
Med Econ; 1995 Jul; 72(13):52-3, 57-8, 63-7. PubMed ID: 10143926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
