These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16514764)
21. Kass v. Kass. New York. Court of Appeals. North East Rep Second Ser; 1998 May; 696():174-82. PubMed ID: 11852946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. What are the ownership rights for gametes and embryos? Advance directives and the disposition of cryopreserved gametes and embryos. Pennings G Hum Reprod; 2000 May; 15(5):979-86. PubMed ID: 10783338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. My egg, your sperm, whose preembryo? A proposal for deciding which party receives custody of frozen preembryos. Katz DA Va J Soc Policy Law; 1998; 5(3):623-74. PubMed ID: 11979606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Posthumous reproduction. Robertson JA Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(4):1027-65. PubMed ID: 11653158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Frozen embryo disputes revisited: a trilogy of procreation-avoidance approaches. Daar JF J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 11508196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Liberty and assisted reproduction. Robertson JA Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):48-53. PubMed ID: 11654494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Cold shoulder treatment: the disposition of frozen embryos post-divorce. King M Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1999 Fall-2000 Spring; 25(1-2):99-137. PubMed ID: 16211741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Parenthood, genes, and gametes: the family law and trusts and estates perspectives. Cahn NR Univ Memphis Law Rev; 2002; 32(3):563-606. PubMed ID: 16526142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The "embryo" wars: at the epicenter of science, law, religion, and politics. Crockin SL Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):599-632. PubMed ID: 16610149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Ethical dilemmas in reproductive medicine. Paine SJ; Moore PK; Hill DL Whittier Law Rev; 1996; 18(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 16273701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Precommitment issues in bioethics. Robertson JA Tex Law Rev; 2003 Jun; 81(7):1849-76. PubMed ID: 15478266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Reproductive capacity: what does the embryo get? Stephens KU South Univ Law Rev; 1997; 24(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 16528857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Sign on the dotted line: enforceability of signed agreements, upon divorce of the married couple, concerning the disposition of their frozen preembryos. Rosado M New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(4):1041-75. PubMed ID: 15162814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Precommitment stategies [sic] for disposition of frozen embryos. Robertson JA Emory Law J; 2001; 50(4):989-1046. PubMed ID: 12956135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Consent, frozen embryos, procreative choice and the ideal family. Scully-Hill A Camb Law J; 2004 Mar; 63(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 16602206 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Human reproduction: reflections on the Nachmani case. Dorner D Tex Int Law J; 2000; 35(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 12656085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]