These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16514782)
1. Finding clarity in a Gray opinion: a critique of Pennsylvania's informed consent doctrine. Kottkamp NA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1999; 61(1):241-85. PubMed ID: 16514782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Practice makes perfect: experience-related information should fall within the purview of Pennsylvania's doctrine of informed consent. Rostolsky BM Duquesne Law Rev; 2002; 40(3):543-60. PubMed ID: 15212018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The law of informed consent: from "doctor is right" to "patient has rights". Kurtz SF Syracuse Law Rev; 2000; 50(4):1243-60. PubMed ID: 16528861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dries v. Gregor: a case study of informed consent doctrine in New York. Schreiber JA N Y State Bar J; 1981 Oct; 53(6):431-7. PubMed ID: 16044597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The second revolution in informed consent: comparing physicians to each other. Twerski AD; Cohen NB Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1999; 94(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 12455555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Tort law--informed consent to medical treatment: a case of medical negligence. Gaughran N Dubl Univ Law J; 1997; (19):178-97. PubMed ID: 12449972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Full disclosure of risks. White SM; Baldwin TJ Anaesthesia; 2005 Feb; 60(2):205. PubMed ID: 15644029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Medical care as physical injury from the viewpoint of the surgeon]. Neuhaus PJ Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1998 Oct; 92(8-9):542-6. PubMed ID: 9885156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Treatment of mentally incompetent patients. Legal requirements in surgery]. Weissauer W Chirurg; 1999 Nov; 70(11):suppl 318-26. PubMed ID: 10691351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed confusion: the doctrine of informed consent in Georgia. Richards JH Georgia Law Rev; 2003; 37(3):1129-66. PubMed ID: 15199938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. You can't get there from here: a case comment on Arndt v. Smith. Nelson E; Caulfield T Univ B C Law Rev; 1998; 32(2):353-64. PubMed ID: 12778911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Waiting-list worries cause Calgary MDs to prepare letter for patients. Lightstone S CMAJ; 1999 Jul; 161(2):183-4. PubMed ID: 10454844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent to surgery. Brazier M Med Sci Law; 1979 Jan; 19(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 759794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Malpractice, informed consent, and the use of low osmolality contrast media. Eisner JM; Casey BJ Conn Med; 1988 Feb; 52(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 3278846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Denial of obligation to disclose name of the surgeon]. Otto F Med Welt; 1982 Jul; 33(28):1048. PubMed ID: 7121235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Recent developments in Tennessee's doctrine of informed consent. Porch DS Univ Memphis Law Rev; 2000; 30(3):593-623. PubMed ID: 16526144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Litigation, legislation, and ethics. Are you a doctor ... ? Jerrold L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):547-8. PubMed ID: 16214641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pushing the limits of informed consent: Johnson v. Kokemoor and physician-specific disclosure. Heinemann RA Wis L Rev; 1997; 5():1079-121. PubMed ID: 16329220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]