These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
585 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16515092)
1. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Lazzara RJ; Porter SS Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Feb; 26(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 16515092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone maintenance around tissue level implant and bone level implant: a randomised controlled trial. A 1-year follow-up. Fernández-Formoso N; Rilo B; Mora MJ; Martínez-Silva I; Díaz-Afonso AM J Oral Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 39(11):830-7. PubMed ID: 22889084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Platform-switched restorations on wide-diameter implants: a 5-year clinical prospective study. Vigolo P; Givani A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 19344032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants. Cappiello M; Luongo R; Di Iorio D; Bugea C; Cocchetto R; Celletti R Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 18717373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible. King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Soft tissue and crestal bone changes around implants with platform-switched abutments placed nonsubmerged at subcrestal position: a 2-year clinical and radiographic evaluation. Aimetti M; Ferrarotti F; Mariani GM; Ghelardoni C; Romano F Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1369-77. PubMed ID: 26478966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: initial observations and case report. Baumgarten H; Cocchetto R; Testori T; Meltzer A; Porter S Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005; 17(10):735-40. PubMed ID: 16506616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiological comparison of laser-microtextured and platform-switched implants in thin mucosal biotype. Linkevicius T; Puisys A; Svediene O; Linkevicius R; Linkeviciene L Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 May; 26(5):599-605. PubMed ID: 25558894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of hard tissue response around wider platform-switched implants. Cocchetto R; Traini T; Caddeo F; Celletti R Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Apr; 30(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 20228975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. Tarnow DP; Cho SC; Wallace SS J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):546-9. PubMed ID: 10807116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hard and soft tissue responses to the platform-switching technique. Luongo R; Traini T; Guidone PC; Bianco G; Cocchetto R; Celletti R Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Dec; 28(6):551-7. PubMed ID: 19146050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. Hürzeler M; Fickl S; Zuhr O; Wachtel HC J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 65(7 Suppl 1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17586347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around internal-hex implants with switched platform: a clinical case report series. de Almeida FD; Carvalho AC; Fontes M; Pedrosa A; Costa R; Noleto JW; Mourão CF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):587-92. PubMed ID: 21691606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A retrospective radiographic analysis of bone loss following placement of TiO2 grit-blasted implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible. Warren P; Chaffee N; Felton DA; Cooper LF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 12074456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss using modified abutment connections at various crestal level placements. Veis A; Parissis N; Tsirlis A; Papadeli C; Marinis G; Zogakis A Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Dec; 30(6):609-17. PubMed ID: 20967307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of individual bone patterns on peri-implant bone loss: preliminary report from a 3-year randomized clinical and histologic trial in patients treated with implants restored with matching-diameter abutments or the platform-switching concept. Canullo L; Iannello G; Götz W Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):618-30. PubMed ID: 21691610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of thin mucosal tissues on crestal bone stability around implants with platform switching: a 1-year pilot study. Linkevicius T; Apse P; Grybauskas S; Puisys A J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 68(9):2272-7. PubMed ID: 20605308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors influencing the preservation of the periimplant marginal bone. Hermann F; Lerner H; Palti A Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 17563507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]