These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16515138)

  • 1. Effect of signal-to-noise ratio on directional microphone benefit and preference.
    Walden BE; Surr RK; Grant KW; Van Summers W; Cord MT; Dyrlund O
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):662-76. PubMed ID: 16515138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction on Subcortical and Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Older Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Slugocki C; Kuk F; Korhonen P
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1282-1293. PubMed ID: 32058351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech recognition and comfort using hearing instruments with adaptive directional characteristics in asymmetric listening conditions.
    Mackenzie E; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 16378001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in everyday listening.
    Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Dyrlund O
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 May; 15(5):365-96. PubMed ID: 15506498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving speech intelligibility in background noise with an adaptive directional microphone.
    Blamey PJ; Fiket HJ; Steele BR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006; 17(7):519-30. PubMed ID: 16927516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits in Speech Recognition in Noise with Remote Wireless Microphones in Group Settings.
    Thibodeau LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):404-411. PubMed ID: 31758679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Better speech perception in noise with an assistive multimicrophone array for hearing AIDS.
    Luts H; Maj JB; Soede W; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 15599189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The robustness of hearing aid microphone preferences in everyday listening environments.
    Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Grant KW; Summers V; Dittberner AB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 May; 18(5):358-79. PubMed ID: 17715647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Maj JB; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The minimum monitoring signal-to-noise ratio for off-axis signals and its implications for directional hearing aids.
    Archer-Boyd AW; Holman JA; Brimijoin WO
    Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 357():64-72. PubMed ID: 29223929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of a reverse cardioid directional microphone.
    Kuk F; Keenan D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 22284842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: I. Speech perception outcomes.
    Bentler R; Palmer C; Mueller HG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Mar; 17(3):179-89. PubMed ID: 16646278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Measure Hearing Aid Benefit.
    Kuk F; Seper E; Lau CC; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):698-707. PubMed ID: 28906241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An objective measure for selecting microphone modes in OMNI/DIR hearing aid circuits.
    Grant KW; Elhilali M; Shamma SA; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Summers V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 18595186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
    Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.