These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16515138)

  • 21. An Integrative Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Directional Microphone and Noise-Reduction Algorithm under Realistic Signal-to-Noise Ratios.
    Kuk F; Slugocki C; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):262-270. PubMed ID: 31589137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of a "direct-comparison" approach to automatic switching in omnidirectional/directional hearing aids.
    Summers V; Grant KW; Walden BE; Cord MT; Surr RK; Elhilali M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Oct; 19(9):708-20. PubMed ID: 19418710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.
    Gravel JS; Fausel N; Liskow C; Chobot J
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10037061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Effects of Varying Directional Bandwidth in Hearing Aid Users' Preference and Speech-in-Noise Performance.
    Goyette A; Crukley J; Galster J
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 27(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 29466553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids.
    Cord MT; Surr RK; Walden BE; Dyrlund O
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 May; 15(5):353-64. PubMed ID: 15506497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microphone directionality, pre-emphasis filter, and wind noise in cochlear implants.
    Chung K; McKibben N
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):586-600. PubMed ID: 22192604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of Directionality, Compression, and Working Memory on Speech Recognition.
    Rallapalli V; Ellis G; Souza P
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):492-505. PubMed ID: 33136708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using the Repeat-Recall Test to Examine Factors Affecting Context Use.
    Kuk F; Slugocki C; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Nov; 31(10):771-780. PubMed ID: 33588513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of directional microphone and adaptive multichannel noise reduction algorithm on cochlear implant performance.
    Chung K; Zeng FG; Acker KN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2216-27. PubMed ID: 17069317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Left Lateralization of the Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potential Reflects Aided Processing and Speech-in-Noise Performance of Older Listeners With a Hearing Loss.
    Slugocki C; Kuk F; Korhonen P
    Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):399-410. PubMed ID: 36331191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of hearing aid microphone mode on performance in an auditory orienting task.
    Brimijoin WO; Whitmer WM; McShefferty D; Akeroyd MA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e204-12. PubMed ID: 25148290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of Potential Benefits and Limitations of Noise-Management Technologies for Children with Hearing Aids.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Miller S; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Dunn A; Browning S; Neumann S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Feb; 33(2):66-74. PubMed ID: 35512843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech intelligibility in noisy environments with one- and two-microphone hearing aids.
    Wouters J; Litière L; van Wieringen A
    Audiology; 1999; 38(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 10206518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
    Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: II. Self-report outcomes.
    Palmer C; Bentler R; Mueller HG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Mar; 17(3):190-201. PubMed ID: 16646279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of a directional microphone array for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Soede W; Bilsen FA; Berkhout AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Aug; 94(2 Pt 1):799-808. PubMed ID: 8370886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improving Cochlear Implant Performance in the Wind Through Spectral Masking Release: A Multi-microphone and Multichannel Strategy.
    Chung K
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):420-432. PubMed ID: 31425361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.