These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16516844)

  • 1. Effects of a vertical keyboard design on typing performance, user comfort and muscle tension.
    van Galen GP; Liesker H; de Haan A
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 16516844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of negatively sloped keyboard wedges on risk factors for upper extremity work-related musculoskeletal disorders and user performance.
    Woods M; Babski-Reeves K
    Ergonomics; 2005 Dec; 48(15):1793-808. PubMed ID: 16373317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of split keyboard geometry on upper body postures.
    Rempel D; Nathan-Roberts D; Chen BY; Odell D
    Ergonomics; 2009 Jan; 52(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 19308823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of computer keyboard slope on wrist position and forearm electromyography of typists without musculoskeletal disorders.
    Simoneau GG; Marklin RW; Berman JE
    Phys Ther; 2003 Sep; 83(9):816-30. PubMed ID: 12940768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of the ergonomics of three computer keyboards.
    Zecevic A; Miller DI; Harburn K
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jan; 43(1):55-72. PubMed ID: 10661693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of three computer office workstations offering forearm support: impact on upper limb posture and muscle activation.
    Delisle A; Larivière C; Plamondon A; Imbeau D
    Ergonomics; 2006 Feb; 49(2):139-60. PubMed ID: 16484142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in typing forces, muscle activity, comfort, and typing performance among virtual, notebook, and desktop keyboards.
    Kim JH; Aulck L; Bartha MC; Harper CA; Johnson PW
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1406-13. PubMed ID: 24856862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures.
    Rempel D; Barr A; Brafman D; Young E
    Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 16806042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of horizontal position of the computer keyboard on upper extremity posture and muscular load during computer work.
    Kotani K; Barrero LH; Lee DL; Dennerlein JT
    Ergonomics; 2007 Sep; 50(9):1419-32. PubMed ID: 17654034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of keyswitch stiffness on typing force, finger electromyography, and subjective discomfort.
    Gerard MJ; Armstrong TJ; Franzblau A; Martin BJ; Rempel DM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(6):762-9. PubMed ID: 10635542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface electromyography and mouse use position.
    Harvey R; Peper E
    Ergonomics; 1997 Aug; 40(8):781-9. PubMed ID: 9336102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of an ergonomic keyboard for typists with work related upper extremity disorders: a follow-up study.
    Ripat J; Giesbrecht E; Quanbury A; Kelso S
    Work; 2010; 37(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 20978334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of a split keyboard design and wrist rest on performance, posture, and comfort.
    Smith MJ; Karsh BT; Conway FT; Cohen WJ; James CA; Morgan JJ; Sanders K; Zehel DJ
    Hum Factors; 1998 Jun; 40(2):324-36. PubMed ID: 9720462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electromyographic activity during typewriter and keyboard use.
    Fernström E; Ericson MO; Malker H
    Ergonomics; 1994 Mar; 37(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 8143692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of keyboard key spacing on typing speed, error, usability, and biomechanics: Part 1.
    Pereira A; Lee DL; Sadeeshkumar H; Laroche C; Odell D; Rempel D
    Hum Factors; 2013 Jun; 55(3):557-66. PubMed ID: 23829030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and evaluation of a curved computer keyboard.
    McLoone HE; Jacobson M; Clark P; Opina R; Hegg C; Johnson P
    Ergonomics; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1529-39. PubMed ID: 19941185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design features of alternative computer keyboards: a review of experimental data.
    Marklin RW; Simoneau GG
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Oct; 34(10):638-49. PubMed ID: 15552709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in typing forces, muscle activity, wrist posture, typing performance, and self-reported comfort among conventional and ultra-low travel keyboards.
    Kia K; Sisley J; Johnson PW; Kim JH
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():10-16. PubMed ID: 30487088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of keyboard key spacing on typing speed, error, usability, and biomechanics, Part 2: Vertical spacing.
    Pereira A; Hsieh CM; Laroche C; Rempel D
    Hum Factors; 2014 Jun; 56(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 25029899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of setup configurations of split computer keyboards on wrist angle.
    Marklin RW; Simoneau GC
    Phys Ther; 2001 Apr; 81(4):1038-48. PubMed ID: 11276185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.