These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16517649)

  • 1. A three-dimensional computer model of four hypothetical mechanisms protecting biofilms from antimicrobials.
    Chambless JD; Hunt SM; Stewart PS
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 72(3):2005-13. PubMed ID: 16517649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A three-dimensional computer model analysis of three hypothetical biofilm detachment mechanisms.
    Chambless JD; Stewart PS
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Aug; 97(6):1573-84. PubMed ID: 17274065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling antibiotic tolerance in biofilms by accounting for nutrient limitation.
    Roberts ME; Stewart PS
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2004 Jan; 48(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 14693517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular mechanisms of antimicrobial tolerance and resistance in bacterial and fungal biofilms.
    Van Acker H; Van Dijck P; Coenye T
    Trends Microbiol; 2014 Jun; 22(6):326-33. PubMed ID: 24598086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling antimicrobial tolerance and treatment of heterogeneous biofilms.
    Zhao J; Seeluangsawat P; Wang Q
    Math Biosci; 2016 Dec; 282():1-15. PubMed ID: 27665681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ability of an antimicrobial agent to penetrate a biofilm is not correlated with its killing or removal efficiency.
    Araújo PA; Mergulhão F; Melo L; Simões M
    Biofouling; 2014; 30(6):675-83. PubMed ID: 24773258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling of biocide action against biofilm.
    Zhang T
    Bull Math Biol; 2012 Jun; 74(6):1427-47. PubMed ID: 22318406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Role of Efflux and Physiological Adaptation in Biofilm Tolerance and Resistance.
    Van Acker H; Coenye T
    J Biol Chem; 2016 Jun; 291(24):12565-12572. PubMed ID: 27129224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Viscoelasticity of biofilms and their recalcitrance to mechanical and chemical challenges.
    Peterson BW; He Y; Ren Y; Zerdoum A; Libera MR; Sharma PK; van Winkelhoff AJ; Neut D; Stoodley P; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ
    FEMS Microbiol Rev; 2015 Mar; 39(2):234-45. PubMed ID: 25725015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detachment and diffusive-convective transport in an evolving heterogeneous two-dimensional biofilm hybrid model.
    Luna E; Domínguez-Zacarias G; Ferreira CP; Velasco-Hernandez JX
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Dec; 70(6 Pt 1):061909. PubMed ID: 15697404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tolerance to the antimicrobial peptide colistin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms is linked to metabolically active cells, and depends on the pmr and mexAB-oprM genes.
    Pamp SJ; Gjermansen M; Johansen HK; Tolker-Nielsen T
    Mol Microbiol; 2008 Apr; 68(1):223-40. PubMed ID: 18312276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in biofilm-growing bacteria.
    Macià MD; Rojo-Molinero E; Oliver A
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Oct; 20(10):981-90. PubMed ID: 24766583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combating biofilms.
    Yang L; Liu Y; Wu H; Song Z; Høiby N; Molin S; Givskov M
    FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 65(2):146-57. PubMed ID: 22066868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanisms of biofilm inhibition and degradation by antimicrobial peptides.
    Segev-Zarko L; Saar-Dover R; Brumfeld V; Mangoni ML; Shai Y
    Biochem J; 2015 Jun; 468(2):259-70. PubMed ID: 25761937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A three-dimensional, stochastic simulation of biofilm growth and transport-related factors that affect structure.
    Chang I; Gilbert ES; Eliashberg N; Keasling JD
    Microbiology (Reading); 2003 Oct; 149(Pt 10):2859-2871. PubMed ID: 14523118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling physiological resistance in bacterial biofilms.
    Cogan NG; Cortez R; Fauci L
    Bull Math Biol; 2005 Jul; 67(4):831-53. PubMed ID: 15893555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical simulation of biofilm growth in flow channels using a cellular automaton approach coupled with a macro flow computation.
    Yamamoto T; Ueda S
    Biorheology; 2013; 50(3-4):203-16. PubMed ID: 23863284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-dimensional model of biofilm detachment caused by internal stress from liquid flow.
    Picioreanu C; van Loosdrecht MC; Heijnen JJ
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2001 Jan; 72(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 11114658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of triclosan on Salmonella typhimurium at different growth stages and in biofilms.
    Tabak M; Scher K; Hartog E; Romling U; Matthews KR; Chikindas ML; Yaron S
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2007 Feb; 267(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 17156099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling biofilm antimicrobial resistance.
    Dodds MG; Grobe KJ; Stewart PS
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2000 May; 68(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 10745214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.