These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16517916)

  • 1. Effective detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by a two-step algorithm including tests for antigen and cytotoxin.
    Ticehurst JR; Aird DZ; Dam LM; Borek AP; Hargrove JT; Carroll KC
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):1145-9. PubMed ID: 16517916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-step glutamate dehydrogenase antigen real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
    Goldenberg SD; Cliff PR; Smith S; Milner M; French GL
    J Hosp Infect; 2010 Jan; 74(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 19900734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between the two-step and the three-step algorithms for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
    Qutub MO; AlBaz N; Hawken P; Anoos A
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2011; 29(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 21860113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
    Reller ME; Lema CA; Perl TM; Cai M; Ross TL; Speck KA; Carroll KC
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 45(11):3601-5. PubMed ID: 17804652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease: examination of multiple algorithms using toxin EIA, glutamate dehydrogenase EIA and loop-mediated isothermal amplification.
    Bamber AI; Fitzsimmons K; Cunniffe JG; Beasor CC; Mackintosh CA; Hobbs G
    Br J Biomed Sci; 2012; 69(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 23057158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clostridium difficile testing algorithms: what is practical and feasible?
    Schmidt ML; Gilligan PH
    Anaerobe; 2009 Dec; 15(6):270-3. PubMed ID: 19853666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simple 3-step algorithm for improved laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile toxin without the need for tissue culture cytotoxicity neutralization assays.
    Sharp SE; Ivie WM; Buckles MR; Coover DM; Pohl JC; Hatcher PA
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2009 Jul; 64(3):344-6. PubMed ID: 19376666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tests for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: the next generation.
    Carroll KC
    Anaerobe; 2011 Aug; 17(4):170-4. PubMed ID: 21376826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two rapid assays for Clostridium difficile Common antigen and a C difficile toxin A/B assay with the cell culture neutralization assay.
    Reller ME; Alcabasa RC; Lema CA; Carroll KC
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jan; 133(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 20023265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-stage algorithm for Clostridium difficile: glutamate-dehydrogenase-positive toxin-negative enzyme immunoassay results may require further testing.
    Bignardi GE; Hill K; Berrington A; Settle CD
    J Hosp Infect; 2013 Apr; 83(4):347-9. PubMed ID: 23399483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective assessment of two-stage testing for Clostridium difficile.
    Arnold A; Pope C; Bray S; Riley P; Breathnach A; Krishna S; Planche T
    J Hosp Infect; 2010 Sep; 76(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 20638749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of biosite triage Clostridium difficile panel for rapid detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples.
    Landry ML; Topal J; Ferguson D; Giudetti D; Tang Y
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 May; 39(5):1855-8. PubMed ID: 11326003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is a two-step glutamate dehyrogenase antigen-cytotoxicity neutralization assay algorithm superior to the premier toxin A and B enzyme immunoassay for laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile?
    Gilligan PH
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Apr; 46(4):1523-5. PubMed ID: 18256226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of eight commercial enzyme immunoassays for the detection of Clostridium difficile from stool samples and effect of strain type.
    René P; Frenette CP; Schiller I; Dendukuri N; Brassard P; Fenn S; Loo VG
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 May; 73(1):94-6. PubMed ID: 22424900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of 4 molecular assays as part of a 2-step algorithm for the detection of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens.
    Caulfield AJ; Bolster LaSalle CM; Chang YH; Grys TE
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2018 May; 91(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 29428547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of the TechLab C. DIFF CHEK-60 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in combination with the C. difficile Tox A/B II EIA kit, the Triage C. difficile panel immunoassay, and a cytotoxin assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.
    Snell H; Ramos M; Longo S; John M; Hussain Z
    J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):4863-5. PubMed ID: 15472364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection].
    Le Guern R; Wallet F
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2013; 71(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 23906566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of a modified two-step algorithm using a combined glutamate dehydrogenase/toxin enzyme immunoassay and real-time PCR for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
    Vasoo S; Stevens J; Portillo L; Barza R; Schejbal D; Wu MM; Chancey C; Singh K
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2014 Feb; 47(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 22921803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosing toxigenic Clostridium difficile: new confidence bounds show culturing increases sensitivity of the toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay and refute gold standards.
    Mattner F; Winterfeld I; Mattner L
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2012 Aug; 44(8):578-85. PubMed ID: 22404319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of analytical and clinical performance of three methods for detection of Clostridium difficile.
    LaSala PR; Svensson AM; Mohammad AA; Perrotta PL
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 May; 136(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 22540301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.