These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16518140)

  • 21. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Signal-to-noise ratio adaptive post-filtering method for intelligibility enhancement of telephone speech.
    Jokinen E; Yrttiaho S; Pulakka H; Vainio M; Alku P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3990-4001. PubMed ID: 23231128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises.
    Lee PJ; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 21786892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of noise and filtering on the intelligibility of speech produced during simultaneous communication.
    MacKenzie DJ; Schiavetti N; Whitehead RL; Metz DE
    J Commun Disord; 2004; 37(6):505-15. PubMed ID: 15450438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms.
    Astolfi A; Bottalico P; Barbato G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):247-57. PubMed ID: 22280588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of enhancement of spectral changes on speech intelligibility and clarity preferences for the hearing impaired.
    Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2987-98. PubMed ID: 22501075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech intelligibility in noise using throat and acoustic microphones.
    Acker-Mills BE; Houtsma AJ; Ahroon WA
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Jan; 77(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 16422450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
    van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of tinnitus sound therapy signals on the intelligibility of speech.
    Paglialonga A; Fiocchi S; Parazzini M; Ravazzani P; Tognola G
    J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Aug; 125(8):795-801. PubMed ID: 21729434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults.
    Huang Y; Huang Q; Chen X; Qu T; Wu X; Li L
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
    Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Revisiting perceptual compensation for effects of reverberation in speech identification.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3088-94. PubMed ID: 21110604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: dependency on signal-to-noise ratios.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):531-9. PubMed ID: 22280614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech intelligibility of the callsign acquisition test in a quiet environment.
    Blue M; Ntuen CA; Letowski T
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2004; 10(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 15182474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1777. PubMed ID: 17927437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.