These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16518901)
1. The undue burden: parental notification requirements for publicly funded contraception. Bornstein S Berkeley Womens Law J; 2000; 15():40-75. PubMed ID: 16518901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Misconceived laws: the irrationality of parental involvement requirements for contraception. Arons JR William Mary Law Rev; 2000 Mar; 41(3):1093-131. PubMed ID: 16329212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors. O'Shaughnessy M Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution. Hayhurst MB Mont Law Rev; 1997; 58(2):565-98. PubMed ID: 16180294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Utah and publicly funded contraceptive services: the struggle to prevent minors from sponging off the government. Chitwood M J Contemp Law; 1987; 13(2):277-300. PubMed ID: 11658998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Whither the family and family privacy? Jones TR; Peterman L Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):193-236. PubMed ID: 15706723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness. Ehrlich JS Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexual and reproductive health care for adolescents: legal rights and policy challenges. English A Adolesc Med State Art Rev; 2007 Dec; 18(3):571-81, viii-ix. PubMed ID: 18453235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative. Green W Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors. Scuder AC Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II. Graziano SG Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Special weight" for best-interests minors in the new era of parental autonomy. Storrow RF; Martinez S Wis L Rev; 2003; (5):789-841. PubMed ID: 16437822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care. Bertuglia J Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Review of abortion policy: legality, medicaid funding, and parental involvement, 1967-1994. Merz JF; Jackson CA; Klerman JA Womens Rights Law Report; 1995; 17(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11863033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Parental notification: a necessary first step. Hatch OG Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1982 Mar; 128(35):S3164-8. PubMed ID: 11650721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Family law I: abortion. Koscs ME Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Confidential reproductive health services for minors: the potential impact of mandated parental involvement for contraception. Jones RK; Boonstra H Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2004; 36(5):182-91. PubMed ID: 15519960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]