These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16518901)

  • 21. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
    Ehrlich JS
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Privacy issues for girls are in the news and in BJN.
    Foss TD
    Br J Nurs; 2006 Jan 26-Feb 8; 15(2):65. PubMed ID: 16493277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Adolescents' reports of parental knowledge of adolescents' use of sexual health services and their reactions to mandated parental notification for prescription contraception.
    Jones RK; Purcell A; Singh S; Finer LB
    JAMA; 2005 Jan; 293(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 15657327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Case reopens abortion issue for justices.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 16450459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Storm over Washington: the parental notification proposal.
    Kenney AM; Forrest JD; Torres A
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(4):185, 187-90, 192-7. PubMed ID: 7117507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Senate removes abortion option for young girls.
    Hulse C
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Jul; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 16909491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases.
    Ehrlich JS
    Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Court to tackle abortion again after 5 years; parent notification case; in considering technical issues, justices rejoin a fractious debate.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2005 May; ():A1, A17. PubMed ID: 15948341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reproductive freedom issues in legal services practice.
    Law S
    Clgh Rev; 1978 Nov; 12(7):389-403. PubMed ID: 11665039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Coerced sterilization under federally funded family planning programs.
    Diamond E
    New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):589-614. PubMed ID: 11664603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Care of a sexually active adolescent.
    Klein DA
    Am Fam Physician; 2012 Sep; 86(5):457-8, 463. PubMed ID: 22963065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An unjust act: the schizophrenic state of maturity and culpability in juvenile justice and minor abortion rights law; recent trends in Virginia and nationally.
    Foxworth JM
    William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):495-533. PubMed ID: 15977329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech.
    Weeks AB
    North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Requirements applicable to projects for family planning services: Public Health Service. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1982 Feb; 47(35):7699-701. PubMed ID: 10254378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mother, may I?: ramifications for parental involvement laws for minors seeking abortion services.
    Blasdell J
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 16526133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The minor's limited right to confidential health care and the inverse of confidentiality: a parent's decision not to disclose illness status to a minor child.
    van Straaten J
    Child Leg Rights J; 2000; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 16493796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of federal funding for family planning.
    Crane PM; Roylance S
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Apr; 127(55):E1599-601. PubMed ID: 11655452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.