414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16519182)
1. A histomorphometric comparison of the bone graft-titanium interface between interpositional and onlay/inlay bone grafting techniques.
Sjöström M; Lundgren S; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 16519182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histologic analysis of clinically retrieved titanium microimplants placed in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation.
Jensen OT; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):513-21. PubMed ID: 9714958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simultaneous or delayed placement of titanium implants in free autogenous iliac bone grafts. Histological analysis of the bone graft-titanium interface in 10 consecutive patients.
Lundgren S; Rasmusson L; Sjöström M; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Feb; 28(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 10065646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deep-frozen allogeneic onlay bone grafts for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges: a preliminary study.
Barone A; Varanini P; Orlando B; Tonelli P; Covani U
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 67(6):1300-6. PubMed ID: 19446220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stability evaluation of implants integrated in grafted and nongrafted maxillary bone: a clinical study from implant placement to abutment connection.
Rasmusson L; Thor A; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 20491814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A modified method of simultaneous bone grafting and placement of endosseous implants in the severely atrophic maxilla.
Krekmanov L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(6):682-8. PubMed ID: 8530170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Augmentation of the posterior atrophic edentulous maxilla with implants placed in the ulna: a prospective single-blind controlled clinical trial.
Cannizzaro G; Leone M; Consolo U; Ferri V; Licitra G; Worthington H; Esposito M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 17465354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Outcome of oral implants after autogenous bone reconstruction].
Kamal D; Abida S; Jammet P; Goudot P; Yachouh J
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 19327803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oral implants in combination with bone grafts. A 3-year retrospective multicenter study using the Brånemark implant system.
Lekholm U; Wannfors K; Isaksson S; Adielsson B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Jun; 28(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 10355938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival analysis of endosseous implants in grafted and nongrafted edentulous maxillae.
Becktor JP; Isaksson S; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 14982363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring of implant stability in grafted bone using resonance frequency analysis. A clinical study from implant placement to 6 months of loading.
Sjöström M; Lundgren S; Nilson H; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 34(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 15617966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in the maxillae of minipigs. Part II: histomorphometric analysis.
Nkenke E; Fenner M; Vairaktaris EG; Neukam FW; Radespiel-Tröger M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 16161738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tridimensional reconstruction of knife-edge edentulous maxillae by sinus elevation, onlay grafts, and sagittal osteotomy of the anterior maxilla: preliminary surgical and prosthetic results.
Chiapasco M; Romeo E; Vogel G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 9638010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endosseous implants and bone augmentation in the partially dentate maxilla: an analysis of 17 patients with a follow-up of 29 to 101 months.
Becktor JP; Isaksson S; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):603-8. PubMed ID: 17929521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant reconstruction of the bone-grafted maxilla: review of the literature and presentation of 8 cases.
Clayman L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):674-82. PubMed ID: 16546648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of titanium mesh for staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation: clinical and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation.
Proussaefs P; Lozada J
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):237-47. PubMed ID: 17069168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histomorphometric evaluation and clinical assessment of endosseous implants in iliac bone grafts with shortened healing periods.
Nelson K; Ozyuvaci H; Bilgic B; Klein M; Hildebrand D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(3):392-8. PubMed ID: 16796281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical-prosthodontic reconstruction of advanced maxillary bone compromise with autogenous onlay block bone grafts and osseointegrated endosseous implants: a 12-year study of 32 consecutive patients.
Keller EE; Tolman DE; Eckert S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 10212536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
