412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16519182)
21. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.
Bornstein MM; Chappuis V; von Arx T; Buser D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1034-43. PubMed ID: 18828820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Maxillary antral-nasal inlay autogenous bone graft reconstruction of compromised maxilla: a 12-year retrospective study.
Keller EE; Tolman DE; Eckert SE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):707-21. PubMed ID: 10531743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Efficacy of implant placement after bone grafting for three-dimensional reconstruction of the posterior jaw.
Bahat O; Fontanessi RV
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Jun; 21(3):220-31. PubMed ID: 11490399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Endosteal implants and iliac crest grafts to restore severely resorbed totally edentulous maxillae--a retrospective study.
Misch CE; Dietsh F
J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(2):100-10. PubMed ID: 7869412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Porous titanium granules used as osteoconductive material for sinus floor augmentation: a clinical pilot study.
Bystedt H; Rasmusson L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 18657154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. One-stage maxillary sinus elevation using a bone core containing a preosseointegrated implant from the mandibular symphysis.
Wang PD; Klein S; Kaufman E
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Oct; 22(5):435-9. PubMed ID: 12449303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Two-stage maxillary sinus reconstruction with endosseous implants: a prospective study.
Blomqvist JE; Alberius P; Isaksson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 9857586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Implants and sinus-inlay bone grafts in a 1-stage procedure on severely atrophied maxillae: surgical aspects of a 3-year follow-up study.
Johansson B; Wannfors K; Ekenbäck J; Smedberg JI; Hirsch J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):811-8. PubMed ID: 10612917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A retrospective 5-year follow-up study of two different titanium implant surfaces used after interpositional bone grafting for reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla.
Hallman M; Mordenfeld A; Strandkvist T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 16219241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bone-to-implant apposition with machined and MTX microtextured implant surfaces in human sinus grafts.
Trisi P; Marcato C; Todisco M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Oct; 23(5):427-37. PubMed ID: 14620117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.
Cordaro L; Bosshardt DD; Palattella P; Rao W; Serino G; Chiapasco M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 18705811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws.
Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Are culture-expanded autogenous bone cells a clinically reliable option for sinus grafting?
Fuerst G; Strbac GD; Vasak C; Tangl S; Leber J; Gahleitner A; Gruber R; Watzek G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19077153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bone reformation and implant integration following maxillary sinus membrane elevation: an experimental study in primates.
Palma VC; Magro-Filho O; de Oliveria JA; Lundgren S; Salata LA; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 16681489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dental implants placed in expanded narrow edentulous ridges with the Extension Crest device. A 1-3-year multicenter follow-up study.
Chiapasco M; Ferrini F; Casentini P; Accardi S; Zaniboni M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 16672021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study.
Benlidayi ME; Kürkcü M; Oz IA; Sertdemir Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):704-11. PubMed ID: 19885412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sinus lift, and inlay bone-grafting for reconstruction in the severely atrophic maxilla: a new vision of the sandwich technique, using bone scrapers and piezosurgery.
Muñoz-Guerra MF; Naval-Gías L; Capote-Moreno A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):613-8. PubMed ID: 19231789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Histologic evaluation of autogenous calvarial bone in maxillary onlay bone grafts: a report of 2 cases.
Orsini G; Bianchi AE; Vinci R; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):594-8. PubMed ID: 12939015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The management of a severely resorbed edentulous maxilla using a bone graft and a CAD/CAM-guided immediately loaded definitive implant prosthesis: a clinical report.
Cheng AC; Tee-Khin N; Siew-Luen C; Lee H; Wee AG
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 18262007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
