155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16519206)
1. Tertiary cardiac care services in Rhode Island.
Buechner JS
Med Health R I; 2006 Jan; 89(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 16519206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiac study shows wide performance gaps.
Healthc Benchmarks; 2001 Sep; 8(9):100-2, 97. PubMed ID: 11561376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is angioplasty safe at community hospitals without cardiac surgery?
Shaddinger DE; McNamara NS; Graham M
Nurs Spectr (Wash D C); 1999 Jan; 9(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 10542799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rhode Island's Cardiac Services Registry.
Dexter MK; Buechner JS
Med Health R I; 2000 Jan; 83(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 10695308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Transfer for primary angioplasty: the importance of time.
Herrmann HC
Circulation; 2005 Feb; 111(6):718-20. PubMed ID: 15710773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The challenge of improving cardiac care in secondary centres.
Bridgman P
N Z Med J; 2004 May; 117(1194):U888. PubMed ID: 15156206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The top 100 cardiac programs. HCIA study shows midsized cities can hold their own when it comes to cardiac care.
Morrissey J
Mod Healthc; 1999 Mar; 29(11):28-9. PubMed ID: 10346364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Implementation of a continuous quality improvement program for percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac surgery at a large community hospital.
Brush JE; Balakrishnan SA; Brough J; Hartman C; Hines G; Liverman DP; Parker JP; Rich J; Tindall N
Am Heart J; 2006 Aug; 152(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 16875926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency of selected surgical procedures, Rhode Island, 1999-2002.
Williams KA; Buechner JS
Med Health R I; 2004 Feb; 87(2):50-1. PubMed ID: 15031967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hartford project sheds light on cardiovascular care.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1991; 11(5):8. PubMed ID: 10120875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stents or surgery? New data on the comparative outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Hlatky MA; Bravata DM
Circulation; 2008 Jul; 118(4):325-7. PubMed ID: 18645064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Public reporting of quality measures what are we trying to accomplish?
Califf RM; Peterson ED
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 53(10):831-3. PubMed ID: 19264237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The ICCU without on-site interventional facilities in the era of primary angioplasty: core of the cardiology division or travel agency?].
Vergara G
Ital Heart J Suppl; 2003 Jan; 4(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 12690934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Atherosclerosis secondary prevention performance measures after coronary bypass graft surgery compared with percutaneous catheter intervention and nonintervention patients in the Get With the Guidelines database.
Hiratzka LF; Eagle KA; Liang L; Fonarow GC; LaBresh KA; Peterson ED;
Circulation; 2007 Sep; 116(11 Suppl):I207-12. PubMed ID: 17846305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Community hospital versus tertiary hospital comparison in the treatment and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndrome: a New Zealand experience.
Tang EW; Wong CK; Herbison P
N Z Med J; 2006 Jul; 119(1238):U2078. PubMed ID: 16868575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Report of the Spanish Cardiology Association presented to the Health Department on the current problems of the specialty].
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1978; 31(4):381-90. PubMed ID: 694167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating risks and benefits in coronary revascularisation--a very imperfect art?
de Belder MA; Hamilton L
Heart; 2009 Jan; 95(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 18768566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Survival over 5 years in the initial hospital survivors with acute coronary syndrome: a comparison between a community hospital and a tertiary hospital in New Zealand.
Wong CK; Tang EW; Herbison P
N Z Med J; 2007 Sep; 120(1261):U2713. PubMed ID: 17853934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized, controlled trial of coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: six-year follow-up from the Stent or Surgery Trial (SoS).
Booth J; Clayton T; Pepper J; Nugara F; Flather M; Sigwart U; Stables RH;
Circulation; 2008 Jul; 118(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 18606919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2007 update of the clinical competence statement on cardiac interventional procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training (writing Committee to Update the 1998 Clinical Competence Statement on Recommendations for the Assessment and Maintenance of Proficiency in Coronary Interventional Procedures).
King SB; Aversano T; Ballard WL; Beekman RH; Cowley MJ; Ellis SG; Faxon DP; Hannan EL; Hirshfeld JW; Jacobs AK; Kellett MA; Kimmel SE; Landzberg JS; McKeever LS; Moscucci M; Pomerantz RM; Smith KM; Vetrovec GW; Creager MA; Hirshfeld JW; Holmes DR; Newby LK; Weitz HH; Merli G; Piña I; Rodgers GP; Tracy CM; ; ;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jul; 50(1):82-108. PubMed ID: 17601554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
