207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16519557)
1. Key issues in handling and reporting radical prostatectomy specimens.
Srigley JR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):303-17. PubMed ID: 16519557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. International society of urological pathology consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Egevad L; Srigley JR; Delahunt B
Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Jul; 18(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 21654361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancer reporting and staging: needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Grignon DJ
Mod Pathol; 2018 Jan; 31(S1):S96-109. PubMed ID: 29297497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical prostatectomy specimens among Medicare patients in New York State: a review of pathologists' reports.
Imperato PJ; Waisman J; Nenner RP
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):966-71. PubMed ID: 9822124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens].
Compérat E; Camparo P; Srigley J; Delahunt B; Egevad L;
Ann Pathol; 2013 Jun; 33(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 23790653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of tumor volume in radical prostatectomy and needle biopsy specimens.
Epstein JI
J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):790-7. PubMed ID: 21788055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens.
Epstein JI; Amin M; Boccon-Gibod L; Egevad L; Humphrey PA; Mikuz G; Newling D; Nilsson S; Sakr W; Srigley JR; Wheeler TM; Montironi R
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 2005 May; (216):34-63. PubMed ID: 16019758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Analysis and prognostic factors of the specimen of radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer].
Fromont G; Molinié V; Soulié M; Salomon L
Prog Urol; 2015 Nov; 25(15):999-1009. PubMed ID: 26519964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dataset for reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting.
Kench JG; Delahunt B; Griffiths DF; Humphrey PA; McGowan T; Trpkov K; Varma M; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR
Histopathology; 2013 Jan; 62(2):203-18. PubMed ID: 23240714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Key issues in reporting common cancer specimens: problems in pathologic staging of colon cancer.
Compton CC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 16519558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume.
van der Kwast TH; Amin MB; Billis A; Epstein JI; Griffiths D; Humphrey PA; Montironi R; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR; Egevad L; Delahunt B;
Mod Pathol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 20818340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease.
Magi-Galluzzi C; Evans AJ; Delahunt B; Epstein JI; Griffiths DF; van der Kwast TH; Montironi R; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR; Egevad LL; Humphrey PA;
Mod Pathol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 20802467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is tumor volume an independent predictor of progression following radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis of 185 clinical stage B adenocarcinomas of the prostate with 5 years of followup.
Epstein JI; Carmichael M; Partin AW; Walsh PC
J Urol; 1993 Jun; 149(6):1478-81. PubMed ID: 8501792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens. A protocol with clinical relevance.
Montironi R; Mazzucchelli R; Kwast T
Virchows Arch; 2003 Mar; 442(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 12647209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens: rationale and organization.
Egevad L; Srigley JR; Delahunt B
Mod Pathol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 20802466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gleason scores from prostate biopsies obtained with 18-gauge biopsy needles poorly predict Gleason scores of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Djavan B; Kadesky K; Klopukh B; Marberger M; Roehrborn CG
Eur Urol; 1998; 33(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 9555550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of a cooperative educational program to improve prostate pathology reports among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Imperato PJ; Waisman J; Wallen M; Pryor V; Rojas M; Giardelli K; Daley M
J Community Health; 2002 Feb; 27(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11845938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radical prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate.
Ohori M; Kattan M; Scardino PT; Wheeler TM
Mod Pathol; 2004 Mar; 17(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 14765206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
