Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16519558)

  • 1. Key issues in reporting common cancer specimens: problems in pathologic staging of colon cancer.
    Compton CC
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 16519558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes and problematic areas in interpretation of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th Edition, for breast cancer.
    Connolly JL
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 16519555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Problems in pathologic staging of lung cancer.
    Marchevsky AM
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 16519556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Key issues in handling and reporting radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Srigley JR
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):303-17. PubMed ID: 16519557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.
    Compton CC; Fielding LP; Burgart LJ; Conley B; Cooper HS; Hamilton SR; Hammond ME; Henson DE; Hutter RV; Nagle RB; Nielsen ML; Sargent DJ; Taylor CR; Welton M; Willett C
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Jul; 124(7):979-94. PubMed ID: 10888773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An international survey-based study on colorectal cancer pathology reporting-guidelines versus local practice.
    Urbanowicz M; Grabsch HI; Fiteni F; Liu Y; Caballero C; Fléjou JF
    Virchows Arch; 2018 Dec; 473(6):697-708. PubMed ID: 30255341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Colorectal carcinoma: selected issues in pathologic examination and staging and determination of prognostic factors.
    Washington MK
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Oct; 132(10):1600-7. PubMed ID: 18834218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Updated protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with colorectal carcinoma. A basis for checklists.
    Compton CC; Henson DE; Hutter RV; Sobin LH; Bowman HE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Dec; 121(12):1247-54. PubMed ID: 9431313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introduction of the 7th edition eyelid carcinoma classification system from the American Joint Committee on Cancer-International Union Against Cancer staging manual.
    Ainbinder DJ; Esmaeli B; Groo SC; Finger PT; Brooks JP
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Aug; 133(8):1256-61. PubMed ID: 19653721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. TNM staging of colorectal carcinoma: issues and caveats.
    Shia J; Klimstra DS; Bagci P; Basturk O; Adsay NV
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 29(3):142-53. PubMed ID: 23062421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Challenges with colorectal cancer staging: results of an international study.
    Karamchandani DM; Chetty R; King TS; Liu X; Westerhoff M; Yang Z; Yantiss RK; Driman DK
    Mod Pathol; 2020 Jan; 33(1):153-163. PubMed ID: 31383959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Barriers to optimal assessment of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer specimens.
    Wright FC; Law CH; Last LD; Ritacco R; Kumar D; Hsieh E; Khalifa M; Smith AJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 May; 121(5):663-70. PubMed ID: 15151206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Review of Current Challenges in Colorectal Cancer Reporting.
    Dawson H; Kirsch R; Messenger D; Driman D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2019 Jul; 143(7):869-882. PubMed ID: 30672337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The College of American Pathologists guidelines for whole slide imaging validation are feasible for pediatric pathology: a pediatric pathology practice experience.
    Arnold MA; Chenever E; Baker PB; Boué DR; Fung B; Hammond S; Hendrickson BW; Kahwash SB; Pierson CR; Prasad V; Nicol KK; Barr T
    Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2015; 18(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 25387255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of endoscopy in the staging and management of colorectal cancer.
    ; Fisher DA; Shergill AK; Early DS; Acosta RD; Chandrasekhara V; Chathadi KV; Decker GA; Evans JA; Fanelli RD; Foley KQ; Fonkalsrud L; Hwang JH; Jue T; Khashab MA; Lightdale JR; Muthusamy VR; Pasha SF; Saltzman JR; Sharaf R; Cash BD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jul; 78(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 23664162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. American Joint Committee on Cancer and College of American Pathologists regression grade: a new prognostic factor in rectal cancer.
    Mace AG; Pai RK; Stocchi L; Kalady MF
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jan; 58(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 25489692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinomas of the colon and rectum.
    Stewart CJ; Hillery S; Plattell C
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Sep; 133(9):1359-60; author reply 1360-1. PubMed ID: 19722730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Staging and reporting of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
    Cheng L; Montironi R; Davidson DD; Lopez-Beltran A
    Mod Pathol; 2009 Jun; 22 Suppl 2():S70-95. PubMed ID: 19494855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Quality control of pathological examination in colorectal cancer].
    Teglbjaerg PS; Fenger C
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Oct; 167(44):4170-2. PubMed ID: 16266570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation in the staging of colorectal carcinomas: a survey of current practice.
    Raraty MG; Winstanley JH
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1998 May; 80(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 9682641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.