These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16519814)

  • 1. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Whiting PF; Weswood ME; Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PN; Kleijnen J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Mar; 6():9. PubMed ID: 16519814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment.
    Hollingworth W; Medina LS; Lenkinski RE; Shibata DK; Bernal B; Zurakowski D; Comstock B; Jarvik JG
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 16777553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the quality of diagnostic studies using psychometric instruments: applying QUADAS.
    Mann R; Hewitt CE; Gilbody SM
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 44(4):300-7. PubMed ID: 18836883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews.
    Whiting P; Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Kleijnen J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Nov; 3():25. PubMed ID: 14606960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality assessment of comparative diagnostic accuracy studies: our experience using a modified version of the QUADAS-2 tool.
    Wade R; Corbett M; Eastwood A
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26053845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16539705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Whiting P; Harbord R; Kleijnen J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 May; 5():19. PubMed ID: 15918898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Using AI (QUADAS-AI): Protocol for a Qualitative Study.
    Guni A; Sounderajah V; Whiting P; Bossuyt P; Darzi A; Ashrafian H
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2024 Sep; 13():e58202. PubMed ID: 39293047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Whiting PF; Rutjes AW; Westwood ME; Mallett S; Deeks JJ; Reitsma JB; Leeflang MM; Sterne JA; Bossuyt PM;
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(8):529-36. PubMed ID: 22007046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodological quality of diagnostic accuracy studies on non-invasive coronary CT angiography: influence of QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies included in systematic reviews) items on sensitivity and specificity.
    Schueler S; Walther S; Schuetz GM; Schlattmann P; Dewey M
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1603-22. PubMed ID: 23322410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The methodological quality of diagnostic test accuracy studies for musculoskeletal conditions can be improved.
    Henschke N; Keuerleber J; Ferreira M; Maher CG; Verhagen AP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 24581295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does study quality affect the results of a diagnostic meta-analysis?
    Westwood ME; Whiting PF; Kleijnen J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jun; 5():20. PubMed ID: 15943861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. QUADAS-C: A Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
    Yang B; Mallett S; Takwoingi Y; Davenport CF; Hyde CJ; Whiting PF; Deeks JJ; Leeflang MMG; ; Bossuyt PMM; Brazzelli MG; Dinnes J; Gurusamy KS; Jones HE; Lange S; Langendam MW; Macaskill P; McInnes MDF; Reitsma JB; Rutjes AWS; Sinclair A; de Vet HCW; Virgili G; Wade R; Westwood ME
    Ann Intern Med; 2021 Nov; 174(11):1592-1599. PubMed ID: 34698503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL).
    Lucas NP; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bogduk N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):854-61. PubMed ID: 20056381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assessment of diagnostic before-after studies: development of methodology in the context of a systematic review.
    Meads CA; Davenport CF
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jan; 9():3. PubMed ID: 19152699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Whiting P; Rutjes AW; Dinnes J; Reitsma J; Bossuyt PM; Kleijnen J
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jun; 8(25):iii, 1-234. PubMed ID: 15193208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement properties of quality assessment tools for studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Kaizik MA; Garcia AN; Hancock MJ; Herbert RD
    Braz J Phys Ther; 2020; 24(2):177-184. PubMed ID: 30737020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assessment of machine learning models for diagnostic imaging in orthopaedics: A systematic review.
    Lans A; Pierik RJB; Bales JR; Fourman MS; Shin D; Kanbier LN; Rifkin J; DiGiovanni WH; Chopra RR; Moeinzad R; Verlaan JJ; Schwab JH
    Artif Intell Med; 2022 Oct; 132():102396. PubMed ID: 36207080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodological quality of test accuracy studies included in systematic reviews in obstetrics and gynaecology: sources of bias.
    Morris RK; Selman TJ; Zamora J; Khan KS
    BMC Womens Health; 2011 Mar; 11():7. PubMed ID: 21426545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the methodological quality of studies of the performance of diagnostic tests for bovine tuberculosis using QUADAS.
    Downs SH; More SJ; Goodchild AV; Whelan AO; Abernethy DA; Broughan JM; Cameron A; Cook AJ; Ricardo de la Rua-Domenech R; Greiner M; Gunn J; Nuñez-Garcia J; Rhodes S; Rolfe S; Sharp M; Upton P; Watson E; Welsh M; Woolliams JA; Clifton-Hadley RS; Parry JE
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 May; 153():108-116. PubMed ID: 28392087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.