These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16521757)

  • 1. A cross-spectrum weighting algorithm for speech enhancement and array processing: combining phase-shift information and stationary signal properties.
    Schwetz I; Gruhler G; Obermayer K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):952-64. PubMed ID: 16521757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech enhancement using a generic noise codebook.
    Srinivasan S; Rao Naidu DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL161-7. PubMed ID: 22894316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phase-based dual-microphone robust speech enhancement.
    Aarabi P; Shi G
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2004 Aug; 34(4):1763-73. PubMed ID: 15462443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech enhancement based on neural networks improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant users.
    Goehring T; Bolner F; Monaghan JJ; van Dijk B; Zarowski A; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():183-194. PubMed ID: 27913315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective performance analysis of spherical microphone arrays for speech enhancement in rooms.
    Peled Y; Rafaely B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1473-81. PubMed ID: 22978876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of directional microphone and adaptive multichannel noise reduction algorithm on cochlear implant performance.
    Chung K; Zeng FG; Acker KN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2216-27. PubMed ID: 17069317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Towards undistorted and noise-free speech in an MRI scanner: correlation subtraction followed by spectral noise gating.
    Inouye JM; Blemker SS; Inouye DI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1019-22. PubMed ID: 24606243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1777. PubMed ID: 17927437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodology of selecting the reference source for an active noise control system in a car.
    Dąbrowski Z; Stankiewicz B
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2013; 19(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 23498706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.
    Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2910-20. PubMed ID: 23654396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Joint modeling and maximum-likelihood estimation of pitch and linear prediction coefficient parameters.
    Burshtein D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Mar; 91(3):1531-7. PubMed ID: 1532969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal subband Kalman filter for normal and oesophageal speech enhancement.
    Ishaq R; García Zapirain B
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3569-78. PubMed ID: 25227070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impulse-noise suppression in speech using the stationary wavelet transform.
    Nongpiur RC; Shpak DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):866-79. PubMed ID: 23363105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using a signal cancellation technique to assess adaptive directivity of hearing aids.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):496-511. PubMed ID: 17614507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility.
    Dubbelboer F; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3937-46. PubMed ID: 19206818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aircraft noise and speech intelligibility in an outdoor living space.
    Alvarsson JJ; Nordström H; Lundén P; Nilsson ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3455-62. PubMed ID: 24907809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of adaptive digital signal processing to speech enhancement for the hearing impaired.
    Chabries DM; Christiansen RW; Brey RH; Robinette MS; Harris RW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):65-74. PubMed ID: 3430391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of speech understanding in various types of noise.
    Wong LL; Ng EH; Soli SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2642-51. PubMed ID: 23039457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.