These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16521772)

  • 1. Experimental comparison between speech transmission index, rapid speech transmission index, and speech intelligibility index.
    Larm P; Hongisto V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):1106-17. PubMed ID: 16521772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the Speech Transmission Index for predicting non-native speech intelligibility.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Bronkhorst AW; Houtgast T; Steeneken HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Mar; 115(3):1281-91. PubMed ID: 15058350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a short-time speech-based intelligibility metric to the speech transmission index and intelligibility data.
    Payton KL; Shrestha M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3818-27. PubMed ID: 24180791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved estimation of frequency importance functions.
    Kates JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL459-64. PubMed ID: 24181991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. APEX/SPIN: a free test platform to measure speech intelligibility.
    Francart T; Hofmann M; Vanthornhout J; Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Feb; 56(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 27796135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the combined effects of signal-to-noise ratio and room acoustics on speech intelligibility.
    Bradley JS; Reich RD; Norcross SG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1820-8. PubMed ID: 10530010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors Affecting Acoustics and Speech Intelligibility in the Operating Room: Size Matters.
    McNeer RR; Bennett CL; Horn DB; Dudaryk R
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Jun; 124(6):1978-1985. PubMed ID: 28525511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
    Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modelling speech intelligibility in adverse conditions.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():343-51. PubMed ID: 23716240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic conditions for speech communication in classrooms.
    Pekkarinen E; Viljanen V
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 1842300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet.
    Rennies J; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of time-frequency weighted noisy speech.
    Taal CH; Hendriks RC; Heusdens R; Jensen J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3013-27. PubMed ID: 22087929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can older adults enhance the intelligibility of their speech?
    Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL129-35. PubMed ID: 23363193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Novel Method for Intelligibility Assessment of Nonlinearly Processed Speech in Spaces Characterized by Long Reverberation Times.
    Kurowski A; Kotus J; Odya P; Kostek B
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring the critical band for speech.
    Healy EW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):1083-91. PubMed ID: 16521770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microscopic prediction of speech intelligibility in spatially distributed speech-shaped noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Geravanchizadeh M; Fallah A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):4004-15. PubMed ID: 26723354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Listening difficulty as a subjective measure for evaluation of speech transmission performance in public spaces.
    Morimoto M; Sato H; Kobayashi M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1607-13. PubMed ID: 15478426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.