These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16523172)

  • 1. [Comparative study between medieval (12th -14th c.) and modern skulls samples of five cranio-facial measures].
    Esclassan R; Noirrit E; Guyonnet JJ; Lodter C
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2006 Feb; 107(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16523172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cephalometric comparison of skulls from the fourteenth, sixteenth and twentieth centuries.
    Rock WP; Sabieha AM; Evans RI
    Br Dent J; 2006 Jan; 200(1):33-7; discussion 25; quiz 50. PubMed ID: 16415834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cephalometric norms of a Burkina Faso population.
    Ouédraogo Y; Benyahia H; Diouf JS; Camara T; Bationo R; Ngom PI
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):136-142. PubMed ID: 30772356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
    Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cephalometric comparison of medieval skulls with a modern population.
    Luther F
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Aug; 15(4):315-25. PubMed ID: 8405137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contemporary skull development - palatal angle analysis.
    Dostalova T; Eliasova H; Gabcova D; Feberova J; Kaminek M
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2015; 116(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 25869559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in craniofacial characteristics in Southern Italian children from Naples: a retrospective study by cephalometric analysis.
    Perillo L; Isola G; Esercizio D; Iovane M; Triolo G; Matarese G
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 24295003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cephalometric floating norms as a guide toward a harmonious individual craniofacial pattern among Filipinos.
    Sevilla-Naranjilla MA; Rudzki-Janson I
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1162-8. PubMed ID: 19852610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visualization of individual growth-related craniofacial changes based on cephalometric landmark data: a pilot study.
    Lux CJ; Starke J; Rübel J; Stellzig A; Komposch G
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 12019012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roentgencraniometric analysis of skulls of mammoth hunters from Dolní Vestonice.
    Vlcek E; Smahel Z
    Acta Chir Plast; 2002; 44(4):136-41. PubMed ID: 12661929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A cephalometric study of the pterygoid process during growth].
    Harnet JC; Kahn JL; Bacon W; Sick H
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1995; 96(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 7732322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation).
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 23059564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How does occipitalization influence the dimensions of the cranium?
    Caspersen LM; Kjaer I; Sonnesen L
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2010 Aug; 13(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 20618718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional variation of craniofacial structures in relation to changing masticatory-functional demands.
    Varrela J
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Feb; 14(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 1563473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology.
    Kasai K; Moro T; Kanazawa E; Iwasawa T
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 8529753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Craniofacial morphology in Chinese female twins: a semi-longitudinal cephalometric study.
    Peng J; Deng H; Cao C; Ishikawa M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 16257991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Natural craniofacial changes in the third decade of life: a longitudinal study.
    Akgül AA; Toygar TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):512-22. PubMed ID: 12439480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of cephalometric appraisal of the inheritance of craniofacial pattern in Gorkhas.
    Mehta OP; Gupta DS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 18923224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parental craniofacial morphology in cleft lip with or without cleft palate as determined by cephalometry: a meta-analysis.
    Weinberg SM; Maher BS; Marazita ML
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 Feb; 9(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 16420271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cephalometric correction factors for bite opening--a dry skull study.
    Lam E; Quick AN; Herbison P
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 16495373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.