174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16523172)
1. [Comparative study between medieval (12th -14th c.) and modern skulls samples of five cranio-facial measures].
Esclassan R; Noirrit E; Guyonnet JJ; Lodter C
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2006 Feb; 107(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16523172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cephalometric comparison of skulls from the fourteenth, sixteenth and twentieth centuries.
Rock WP; Sabieha AM; Evans RI
Br Dent J; 2006 Jan; 200(1):33-7; discussion 25; quiz 50. PubMed ID: 16415834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cephalometric norms of a Burkina Faso population.
Ouédraogo Y; Benyahia H; Diouf JS; Camara T; Bationo R; Ngom PI
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):136-142. PubMed ID: 30772356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cephalometric comparison of medieval skulls with a modern population.
Luther F
Eur J Orthod; 1993 Aug; 15(4):315-25. PubMed ID: 8405137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contemporary skull development - palatal angle analysis.
Dostalova T; Eliasova H; Gabcova D; Feberova J; Kaminek M
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2015; 116(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 25869559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in craniofacial characteristics in Southern Italian children from Naples: a retrospective study by cephalometric analysis.
Perillo L; Isola G; Esercizio D; Iovane M; Triolo G; Matarese G
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 24295003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cephalometric floating norms as a guide toward a harmonious individual craniofacial pattern among Filipinos.
Sevilla-Naranjilla MA; Rudzki-Janson I
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1162-8. PubMed ID: 19852610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visualization of individual growth-related craniofacial changes based on cephalometric landmark data: a pilot study.
Lux CJ; Starke J; Rübel J; Stellzig A; Komposch G
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 12019012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Roentgencraniometric analysis of skulls of mammoth hunters from Dolní Vestonice.
Vlcek E; Smahel Z
Acta Chir Plast; 2002; 44(4):136-41. PubMed ID: 12661929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A cephalometric study of the pterygoid process during growth].
Harnet JC; Kahn JL; Bacon W; Sick H
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1995; 96(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 7732322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation).
Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 23059564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How does occipitalization influence the dimensions of the cranium?
Caspersen LM; Kjaer I; Sonnesen L
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2010 Aug; 13(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 20618718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dimensional variation of craniofacial structures in relation to changing masticatory-functional demands.
Varrela J
Eur J Orthod; 1992 Feb; 14(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 1563473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology.
Kasai K; Moro T; Kanazawa E; Iwasawa T
Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 8529753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Craniofacial morphology in Chinese female twins: a semi-longitudinal cephalometric study.
Peng J; Deng H; Cao C; Ishikawa M
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 16257991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Natural craniofacial changes in the third decade of life: a longitudinal study.
Akgül AA; Toygar TU
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):512-22. PubMed ID: 12439480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A study of cephalometric appraisal of the inheritance of craniofacial pattern in Gorkhas.
Mehta OP; Gupta DS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 18923224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parental craniofacial morphology in cleft lip with or without cleft palate as determined by cephalometry: a meta-analysis.
Weinberg SM; Maher BS; Marazita ML
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 Feb; 9(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 16420271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cephalometric correction factors for bite opening--a dry skull study.
Lam E; Quick AN; Herbison P
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 16495373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
