These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16523172)

  • 41. Dimensional differences in the craniofacial morphologies of groups with deep and shallow mandibular antegonial notching.
    Lambrechts AH; Harris AM; Rossouw PE; Stander I
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 8863961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Spontaneous dento-cephalometric changes after the young adult stage].
    Crétot M
    Orthod Fr; 1997; 68(1):41-55. PubMed ID: 9432623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A study on a method to identify the border between mandibular corpus and ramus on lateral cephalometric radiograph.
    Lin YF; Ono Y; Ono H
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1992 Mar; 39(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1581998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Floating norms for the ANB angle as guidance for clinical considerations.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Nov; 90(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 3465233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The relationship between cranial base and maxillo-facial morphology in Egyptian children.
    El-Batran M; Soliman N; El-Wakil Kh
    Homo; 2008; 59(4):287-300. PubMed ID: 18707682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [A study on the intrinsic compensative mechanism of craniofacial soft and hard tissue structures of Uygur adults with normal occlusion].
    Jin H; Luo S; Bai D; Song J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Aug; 18(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 12539541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?
    El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Geometric influence of the sagittal and vertical apical base relationship on the ANB angle.
    Sadat-Khonsari R; Dathe H; Knösel M; Hahn W; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Bauss O
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Mar; 70(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 19322533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Relation of the glenoid fossa to craniofacial morphology, studied on dry human skulls.
    Pirttiniemi P; Kantomaa T; Rönning O
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Dec; 48(6):359-64. PubMed ID: 2288207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The human upper and middle face. A morphological investigation in a Norwegian medieval population. VI. The canine fossa and its relation to cranio-facial phylogenesis.
    Haugen LK
    Acta Morphol Neerl Scand; 1980 Jun; 18(23):113-23. PubMed ID: 6996435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible.
    Nanda RS; Merrill RM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Apr; 105(4):328-44. PubMed ID: 8154458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Linear measurements of the neurocranium are better indicators of population differences than those of the facial skeleton: comparative study of 1,961 skulls.
    Holló G; Szathmáry L; Marcsik A; Barta Z
    Hum Biol; 2010 Feb; 82(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 20504170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prenatal assessment of the antero-posterior jaw relationship in human fetuses: from anatomical to ultrasound cephalometric analysis.
    Captier G; Faure JM; Bäumler M; Canovas F; Demattei C; Daures JP
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jul; 48(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 20815708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Linear and angular filipino cephalometric norms according to age and sex.
    Moldez MA; Sato K; Sugawara J; Mitani H
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):800-5. PubMed ID: 17029513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Morphometric investigation in the skulls of young adults. A comparative study between 19th century and modern Italian samples.
    Defraia E; Camporesi M; Marinelli A; Tollaro I
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jul; 78(4):641-6. PubMed ID: 18302462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cephalometric superimpositions.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):967-76. PubMed ID: 18947269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Skeletal jaw relationships: a quantitative assessment using elliptical Fourier functions.
    Lowe BF; Phillips C; Lestrel PE; Fields HW
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):299-308; discussion 309-10. PubMed ID: 7978525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Radiological and anthropometric analysis of the symmetry and direction of evolution of skulls from some historic populations].
    Gawlikowska-Sroka A
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2006; 52(2):107-17; discussion 117. PubMed ID: 17633126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Maxillary and mandibular base size in ancient skulls and of modern humans from Opi, Abruzzi, Italy: a cross-sectional study.
    Festa F; Capasso L; D'Anastasio R; Anastasi G; Festa M; Caputi S; Tecco S
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):e1-4. PubMed ID: 20209169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Holographic and cephalometric study of the relationship between craniofacial morphology and the initial reactions to high-pull headgear traction.
    Duterloo HS; Kragt G; Algra AM
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 3863488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.