These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16523576)

  • 1. Mandatory genetic dogtags and the Fourth Amendment: the need for a new post-Skinner test.
    Scherer RC
    Georgetown Law J; 1997 Jun; 85(6):2007-38. PubMed ID: 16523576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DNA databanks: when has a good thing gone too far?
    Herlica DA
    Syracuse Law Rev; 2002; 52(3):951-77. PubMed ID: 15212076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA profiles, computer searches, and the Fourth Amendment.
    Kimel CW
    Duke Law J; 2013; 62(4):933-73. PubMed ID: 23461001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The privacy implications of Professor Anderson's proposed mandatory registry for bone marrow donation: a reply.
    Hartman RG
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):531-51. PubMed ID: 11656304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Allowing new technology to erode constitutional protections: a Fourth Amendment challenge to non-consensual DNA testing of prisoners.
    Love SH
    Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(5):1617-60. PubMed ID: 11653232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. School vaccination requirements: historical, social, and legal perspectives.
    Hodge JG; Gostin LO
    KY Law J; 2001-2002 Summer; 90(4):831-90. PubMed ID: 15868682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Department of Defense DNA registry raises legal, ethical issues.
    Mnookin S
    Genewatch; 1996 Aug; 10(1):1, 3, 11. PubMed ID: 11656662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Big brother and his science kit: DNA databases for 21st century crime control?
    Tracy PE; Morgan V
    J Crim Law Criminol; 2000; 90(2):635-90. PubMed ID: 16180286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can the government get into your genes?: A proposed New York statute for the use of genetic identification to establish probable cause.
    Cavoli JG
    Albany Law Rev; 1992; 55(4):1355-414. PubMed ID: 11652956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Privacy concerns regarding government use of genetic information.
    Dash JF
    J Biolaw Bus; 1999; 2(4):46-54. PubMed ID: 11658225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DNA analysis and the Freedom of Information Act: information or invasion?
    Might C
    Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 2001; 26(2):773-95. PubMed ID: 12741386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. At law. Crack, symbolism, and the constitution.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 2722482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mayfield v. Dalton.
    U.S. District Court, D. Hawaii
    Fed Suppl; 1995 Sep; 901():300-6. PubMed ID: 11648311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Fourth Amendment challenges to DNA extraction statutes after Samson v. California.
    Nerko CJ
    Fordham Law Rev; 2008 Nov; 77(2):917-49. PubMed ID: 19353834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Canada's DNA databank: public safety and private costs.
    Parfett J
    Manit Law J; 2002; 29(1):33-79. PubMed ID: 16514758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mayfield v. Dalton.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1997 Mar; 109():1423-7. PubMed ID: 11648309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic privacy: constitutional considerations in forensic DNA testing.
    Burk DL; Hess JA
    Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1994; 5(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11657430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Encouraging bone marrow transplants from unrelated donors: some proposed solutions to a pressing problem.
    Anderson MF
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):477-530. PubMed ID: 11656303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two marines who refused to comply with genetic-testing order face a court-martial.
    Lewis NA
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Apr; ():7. PubMed ID: 11647101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First Amendment challenges to the use of mandatory student fees to help fund student abortions.
    Antonini TJ
    J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 11655933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.