These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16523576)

  • 21. Liberty, privacy, and DNA databases.
    Rosen C
    New Atlantis; 2003; (1):37-52. PubMed ID: 15584193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Willing to give up their DNA, but privacy too?
    Donnan S
    Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Apr; 92(99):1, 9. PubMed ID: 15586925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. US military tightens rules on DNA records.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6575):570. PubMed ID: 8602249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. At what cost?: an argument against mandatory AZT treatment of HIV-positive pregnant women.
    Halem SC
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1997; 32(2):492-528. PubMed ID: 16200699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Who needs special needs? On the constitutionality of collecting DNA and other biometric data from arrestees.
    Kaye DH
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):188-98. PubMed ID: 16789942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reclaiming "abandoned" DNA: the Fourth Amendment and genetic privacy.
    Joh EE
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2006; 100(2):857-84. PubMed ID: 17340772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. DNA fingerprinting and civil liberties.
    Noble AA
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 16789939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Coercing conscience: the effort to mandate abortion as a standard of care.
    Kramlich M
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 15192848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An evaluation of immunization regulations in light of religious objections and the developing right of privacy.
    Dover TE
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1979; 4(2):401-24. PubMed ID: 11661821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. US court challenge may limit use of data in DNA banks.
    Lehrman S
    Nature; 1996 Feb; 379(6564):385. PubMed ID: 8559231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Criminal DNA databank statutes and medical research.
    Bressler DD
    Jurimetrics; 2002; 43(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 15233123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice.
    Juengst ET
    Chic Kent Law Rev; 1999; 75():61-82. PubMed ID: 15732203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Federal genetic nondiscrimination legislation: the new "right" and the race to protect DNA at the local, state, and federal level.
    Hathaway KA
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2002; 52(1):133-77. PubMed ID: 16493794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The medical examination in United States immigration applications: the potential use of genetic testing leads to heightened privacy concerns.
    Burroughs AM
    J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(4):22-32. PubMed ID: 16619448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The end of privacy.
    Rubenfeld J
    Stanford Law Rev; 2008 Oct; 61(1):101-62. PubMed ID: 19031656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Inconsistent government policies: why FDA off-label regulation cannot survive First Amendment review under Greater New Orleans.
    Hall RF; Sobotka E
    Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 17444025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When privacy fails: invoking a property paradigm to mandate the destruction of DNA samples.
    Harlan LM
    Duke Law J; 2004 Oct; 53(7):179-219. PubMed ID: 15736315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Proxy consent and a national DNA databank: an unethical and discriminatory combination.
    Baumann TK
    Iowa Law Rev; 2001 Jan; 86(2):667-701. PubMed ID: 16184651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality?
    Silver SA
    Ohio State Law J; 1998; 58(5):1809-66. PubMed ID: 16211748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genetic privacy: there ought to be a law.
    Annas GJ
    Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15706718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.