255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16523593)
1. Intellectual property rights in genes and gene fragments: a registration solution for expressed sequence tags.
Holman MA; Munzer SR
Iowa Law Rev; 2000 Mar; 85(3):735-848. PubMed ID: 16523593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The scope of utility in the twenty-first century: new guidance for gene-related patents.
Summers TM
Georgetown Law J; 2003 Jan; 91(2):475-509. PubMed ID: 15046071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Intellectual property and biotechnology: the U.S. internal experience--Part II.
Brody B
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2006 Jun; 16(2):105-28. PubMed ID: 17036443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intellectual property. Court tightens patent rules on gene tags.
Kintisch E
Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5742):1797-9. PubMed ID: 16166482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic patents: gatekeeper to the promised cures.
Westin LP
Thomas Jefferson Law Rev; 2002; 25(1):271-99. PubMed ID: 15164741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Public access versus proprietary rights in genomic information: what is the proper role of intellectual property rights?
Mueller JM
J Health Care Law Policy; 2003; 6(2):222-40. PubMed ID: 15017961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The case for genomic patenting.
Poste G
Nature; 1995 Dec; 378(6557):534-6. PubMed ID: 8524376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genes and patent policy: rethinking intellectual property rights.
Andrews LB
Nat Rev Genet; 2002 Oct; 3(10):803-8. PubMed ID: 12360238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Much ado about gene patents: the role of foreseeability.
Gulliford MJ
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2004; 34(2):711-45. PubMed ID: 15115032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Intellectual property. Enhanced: intellectual property landscape of the human genome.
Jensen K; Murray F
Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5746):239-40. PubMed ID: 16224006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gene patents: the need for bioethics scrutiny and legal change.
Andrews LB; Paradise J
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):403-12. PubMed ID: 15742584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The two meanings of how and the gene patenting debate.
Evans JH
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 12230851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The scramble to patent human genes.
Nat Neurosci; 1999 Sep; 2(9):773. PubMed ID: 10461209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Gene patent policy: does issuing gene patents accord with the purposes of the U.S. patent system?
Bradshaw J
Willamette Law Rev; 2001; 37(4):637-60. PubMed ID: 12774776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Whistling in the wind: patents on genetic research are a reality. It's time to reframe the debate.
Caulfield TA; Gold ER
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 2000; 15(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 17333589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Intellectual property and biotechnology: the U.S. internal experience--Part I.
Brody B
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2006 Mar; 16(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 16770885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gene patents and the death of dualism.
Goldberg S
South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 1996; 5(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 16211765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Supreme Court's war on intellectual property.
Gardner JN
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jan; 18(1):101-2. PubMed ID: 10625402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fencing Fisher: alternative methods for patenting expressed sequence tags.
Noonan D
Health Matrix Clevel; 2008; 18(2):441-61. PubMed ID: 19739573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [From intellectual property to commercial property].
Cappelaere P
Bull Cancer; 2005 Apr; 92(4):297-8. PubMed ID: 15888384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
