These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16523832)

  • 1. Pharmacological-induced haptic changes and the accommodative performance in patients with the AT-45 accommodative IOL.
    Stachs O; Schneider H; Beck R; Guthoff R
    J Refract Surg; 2006 Feb; 22(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 16523832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the crystalens.
    Cumming JS
    J Refract Surg; 2006 Sep; 22(7):633-4; author reply 634-5. PubMed ID: 16995542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potentially accommodating intraocular lenses--an in vitro and in vivo study using three-dimensional high-frequency ultrasound.
    Stachs O; Schneider H; Stave J; Guthoff R
    J Refract Surg; 2005; 21(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15724683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional evaluation of accommodating intraocular lens shift and alignment in vivo.
    Marcos S; Ortiz S; Pérez-Merino P; Birkenfeld J; Durán S; Jiménez-Alfaro I
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Jan; 121(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 23948466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Theoretical and measured pseudophakic accommodation after implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens.
    Langenbucher A; Seitz B; Huber S; Nguyen NX; Kuchle M
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 121(12):1722-7. PubMed ID: 14662592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Drug-induced intraocular lens movement and near visual acuity after AcrySof intraocular lens implantation.
    Muftuoglu O; Hosal BM; Karel F; Zilelioglu G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jul; 31(7):1298-305. PubMed ID: 16105598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laserinterferometric measurements of accommodative changes in the position of an optic-shift intraocular lens.
    Uthoff D; Holland D; Hepper D; Gulati A; Koch L; Haigis W
    J Refract Surg; 2009 May; 25(5):416-20. PubMed ID: 19507793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes of the accommodative amplitude and the anterior chamber depth after implantation of an accommodative intraocular lens.
    Schneider H; Stachs O; Göbel K; Guthoff R
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 244(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 16133019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes.
    Kriechbaum K; Findl O; Koeppl C; Menapace R; Drexler W
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar; 112(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 15745773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of pharmacologically manipulated amplitude and starting point on edinger-westphal-stimulated accommodative dynamics in rhesus monkeys.
    Ostrin LA; Glasser A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 48(1):313-20. PubMed ID: 17197548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Three-dimensional ultrasound biomicroscopic examinations for haptic differentiation of potentially accommodative intraocular lenses].
    Stachs O; Schneider H; Stave J; Beck R; Guthoff RF
    Ophthalmologe; 2005 Mar; 102(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 15503052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude.
    Wold JE; Hu A; Chen S; Glasser A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1878-88. PubMed ID: 14604706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pseudophakic accommodation with 2 models of foldable intraocular lenses.
    Vámosi P; Nemeth G; Berta A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Feb; 32(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 16564996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized intraindividual comparison of the accommodative performance of the bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens in presbyopic eyes.
    Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Gala KB
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 150(5):619-627.e1. PubMed ID: 20719298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pseudophakic accommodation with translation lenses--dual optic vs mono optic.
    Langenbucher A; Reese S; Jakob C; Seitz B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):450-7. PubMed ID: 15315660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction.
    Findl O; Kiss B; Petternel V; Menapace R; Georgopoulos M; Rainer G; Drexler W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Apr; 29(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 12686233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual Outcomes and Accommodative Response of the Lumina Accommodative Intraocular Lens.
    Alio JL; Simonov A; Plaza-Puche AB; Angelov A; Angelov Y; van Lawick W; Rombach M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 164():37-48. PubMed ID: 26829595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accommodating intraocular lenses: a critical review of present and future concepts.
    Menapace R; Findl O; Kriechbaum K; Leydolt-Koeppl Ch
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 245(4):473-89. PubMed ID: 16944188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controls required to assess IOL movement during accommodation.
    Schachar RA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1593. PubMed ID: 17010838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between carbachol iontophoresis and intravenous pilocarpine stimulated accommodation in anesthetized rhesus monkeys.
    Wendt M; He L; Glasser A
    Exp Eye Res; 2013 Oct; 115():123-30. PubMed ID: 23850971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.